Wrike

Avaliação de Wrike

Vantagens:

Ótimo programa de gestão de projetos que oferece uma ampla gama de recursos e funcionalidades tais como: flexibilidade, gestão de tarefas, relatórios e análises.

Desvantagens:

O preço pode ser relativamente caro em comparação a outros programas idênticos, o suporte ao cliente também não é dos melhores.

Ótima ferramenta para gestão de projetos

Vantagens:

Ferramenta funcional e prática, com versão mobile que facilita o acompanhamento das atividades. Design clean que permite rápida visualização e entendimento.

Desvantagens:

Só é possível incluir como responsável pela tarefa pessoas que estão cadastradas na ferramenta.

Não é muito amigável

Vantagens:

Ferramenta funciona muito bem para gerenciar projetos.

Desvantagens:

Exigência de fornecer e-mail profissional para uso da ferramenta pode afastar usuários que desejam aprender.

We get so much more done since we began using Wrike.

Comentários: Wrike is a great program. Not only has it helped our various departments manage their projects better, but has given us cross-team visibility we have never had before. That was a huge benefit that we weren't expecting.

Vantagens:

Wrike is EXTREMELY powerful. The learning curve is very manageable and very quickly your teams can be using the tool and improving their efficiency. It has made a TREMENDOUS difference in our productivity. Our teams adopted the program with very little trouble and now it is our main workflow system.I am not sure how we did business before we got Wrike.

Desvantagens:

There is very little we don't like about Wrike. It is a great program. We have always figured out a way to make it do what we need it to for managing our business.

A Powerful Blank Slate, Both Good and Bad

Comentários: As a manager, Wrike has been a struggle worth having. While my comfort level was to use a simpler yet more open tool like Trello, the complexity and number of our marketing campaigns/projects/events led me toward a more full-featured solution. Roll-out took a full year due to the busyness of our team, and after that first year, we scrapped everything based on what we learned and started fresh with a different taxonomy. Ultimately it's a boon for me as a manager to know that the entirety of my department's efforts are captured and managed in a single place, but it's a heavy lift for the team. The Wrike team was helpful with onboarding but didn't offer much direction; they probably would have been more helpful if we had pre-established workflows. Without a history of project management beyond a clunky spreadsheet, we were looking to Wrike to provide more robust templates and guidance in this area.

Vantagens:

Wrike excels at what it sets out to do: manage projects. It is flexible, powerful, and full-featured enough to adapt to virtually any use case, keeping teams on the same page and on-task. The UI is fresh and modern, and the software is iterated weekly with even tiny considerations that make life easier.

Desvantagens:

Wrike is a blank slate, so determining how your busy team will leverage the tool takes a ton of effort. Its interface, while pretty, is as complex as it needs to be to conform to a bevy of use cases. The learning curve for a team is steep, and because it takes months to see benefits, adoption is an exercise in discipline. For some members of the team who struggle with the complexity, managing the tool is a burden and Wrike remains more of an obstacle than a benefit. We've also had no luck getting real-time browser notifications to work; the team either relies on far too many Wrike-generated emails or just living in the tool itself to stay up-to-date.