--- description: Tudo sobre Basecamp: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários graças à Capterra Portugal. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Basecamp - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Portugal 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Ferramentas de Colaboração](/directory/15/collaboration/software) > [Basecamp](/software/56808/basecamp) # Basecamp Canonical: https://www.capterra.pt/software/56808/basecamp Page: 1 / 578\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/56808/basecamp?page=2) > Com a confiança de milhões, o Basecamp coloca tudo de que você precisa para realizar o trabalho em um só lugar. > > Verdict: Rated **4.3/5** by 14422 users. Top-rated for **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa Basecamp? Empreendedores, autônomos, pequenas empresas e grupos dentro de grandes organizações. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Classificação | Detail | | **Geral** | **4.3/5** | 14422 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recursos | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: Basecamp - **Location**: Chicago, EUA - **Founded**: 1999 ## Commercial Context - **Preço inicial**: 15,00 US$ - **Modelo de preços**: (Free version available) (Teste Grátis) - **Target Audience**: Profissional autônomo, 2 - 10, 11 - 50, 51 - 200, 201 - 500, 501 - 1 000, 1 001 - 5 000, 5 001 - 10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Android (celular), iPhone (celular), iPad (tablet) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Available Countries**: Afeganistão, Alanda, Albânia, Alemanha, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antígua e Barbuda, Argentina, Argélia, Arménia, Aruba, Arábia Saudita, Austrália, Azerbaijão, Baamas, Bangladeche, Barbados, Barém, Belize and 207 more ## Recursos - @menções - Acesso para Celular - Alertas/notificações - Arrastar e soltar - Bate-papo ao vivo - Bate-papo em tempo real - Bate-papo/Mensagens instantâneas - Comentários/notas - Compartilhamento de arquivos - Configuração do fluxo de trabalho - Controle de horas - Controle de marcos - Controle do progresso de tarefas - Controles/permissões de acesso - Discussions/Forums - Feed de notícias/atividades - Ferramentas de colaboração - Gerenciamento de documentos - Gestão da comunicação - Gestão de atribuições - Gestão de calendários - Gestão de ideias - Gestão de prazos - Gestão de tarefas - Gestão do fluxo de trabalho - Mensagens instantâneas - Modelos personalizáveis - Monitoramento do progresso - Painel de atividades - Permissões por função - Pesquisa e filtro - Planificação/Programação de projetos - Priorização - Quadro de referência de produtos - Questionários e feedback - Rastreamento do projeto - Relatórios e estatística - Seguimento de relatórios/projetos - Sub-Task Management - Task Editing - Third-Party Integrations ## Integrations (93 total) - AgencyDots - Akita - Apideck - Asana - AssessTEAM - Bridge24 - BrightGauge - Calamari - Centreli - Claritee - ClicData - ClickUp - Clockify - CoSchedule Marketing Suite - Cyfe ... and 78 more integrations ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Assistência 24/7 - Bate-papo ## Category - [Ferramentas de Colaboração](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/15/collaboration/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Ferramentas de Colaboração](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [Ferramentas de Gestão de Projetos](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Ferramentas de Gestão de Tarefas](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [Software de Comunicação de Equipe](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/31033/team-communication/software) - [Software de Gestão de Projetos sem Fins Lucrativos](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Clockify](https://www.capterra.pt/software/169607/clockify) — 4.8/5 (9247 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.pt/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15404 reviews) 3. [Asana](https://www.capterra.pt/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13590 reviews) 4. [Trello](https://www.capterra.pt/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23548 reviews) 5. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.pt/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6059 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Basecamp great for collaboration and project management" — 4.0/5 > **Damian** | *21 de maio de 2026* | Gestão de organizações sem fins lucrativos | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Basecamp allows for great collaboration. Both internally and with external vendors. Good for project management and assigning tasks to members of a project group. Easy to have back and forth chat on a task/project and copy in others. > > **Desvantagens**: Repetition of notification emails when an update on a project is made and a task is also allocated to someone. > > Great tool for team collaboration, organizing, delegating tasks, staying on track with project timeline/due dates and overall project management. ----- ### "Basecamp: Clarity and Communication Over Complexity" — 5.0/5 > **Radha** | *23 de abril de 2026* | Serviços jurídicos | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: What I liked most about Basecamp was its simplicity and clarity. It’s designed to help teams stay organized without feeling overwhelmed. In particular: Clean, user‑friendly interface – Basecamp is easy to navigate, even for new users. Everything is laid out clearly, which reduces confusion and onboarding time. Focused approach to project management – Instead of endless features, Basecamp sticks to core tools like to‑do lists, message boards, schedules, and file sharing. This keeps teams focused on actual work. Strong communication structure – Centralized message boards and comment threads cut down on scattered emails and make it easier to follow conversations over time. Transparency and accountability – Everyone can see what’s happening, who’s responsible for what, and what’s coming next, which supports collaboration and ownership. Minimal setup and maintenance – Projects can be created and managed quickly without complex configuration or customization. Overall, the biggest strength of Basecamp is how it reduces noise and complexity, making it especially effective for teams that value clear communication and straightforward project tracking over heavy customization or advanced workflows. > > **Desvantagens**: What I liked least about Basecamp was that its simplicity can also feel limiting, especially for more complex or fast‑moving teams. In particular: Limited advanced features – Basecamp intentionally avoids things like custom workflows, detailed task dependencies, or advanced reporting, which can make it feel restrictive for larger or more structured projects. Not ideal for complex project tracking – There’s no native support for things like Gantt charts, workload planning, or time tracking, which some teams rely on for visibility and deadlines. Flat structure can feel rigid – Since all projects follow the same basic setup, it’s harder to adapt Basecamp to different project types or processes. Fewer automation options – Compared to other project management tools, automation and integrations are relatively minimal, which can mean more manual follow‑up. Scaling challenges – As the number of projects and conversations grows, it can become harder to manage or surface priorities quickly. Overall, what I liked least wasn’t a flaw so much as a trade‑off: Basecamp prioritizes simplicity over flexibility. That works well for straightforward collaboration but can feel limiting for teams that need more structure, customization, or advanced tracking tools. > > My overall experience with Basecamp was positive and refreshing, especially for teams that value clarity, communication, and simplicity over complex project management frameworks. Basecamp excelled at keeping work organized and easy to follow. Its clean interface and straightforward structure made it easy for everyone on the team to understand where discussions were happening, what tasks were assigned, and what deadlines were coming up—without needing formal training or ongoing system management. Communication felt more intentional and less fragmented thanks to centralized message boards and discussion threads, which significantly reduced email back‑and‑forth. The platform encouraged a calmer, more focused way of working. By limiting features to the essentials, Basecamp helped prevent over‑planning and micromanagement. For smaller teams or projects with well‑defined goals, this approach supported collaboration and accountability without adding unnecessary overhead. However, the experience became less ideal as project complexity increased. The lack of advanced task dependencies, customization, reporting, or automation meant that more structured teams or deadline‑driven projects sometimes needed workarounds or supplementary tools. In those cases, Basecamp felt more suited to coordination and communication than detailed project tracking. Overall, I found Basecamp to be a strong collaboration tool that works best for teams seeking simplicity, transparency, and reduced noise. While it’s not built for highly complex project management, it delivers a smooth, user‑friendly experience that supports effective teamwork and clear communication. ----- ### "Basecamp 5 is a perfect failure" — 2.0/5 > **Drew** | *1 de junho de 2026* | Software | Recommendation rating: 2.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Basecamp has been a reliable project management and client collaboration platform since the classic version, delivering consistent core functionality across message boards, to-dos, file storage, campfire chat, and schedules Flat rate Pro Unlimited pricing is genuinely competitive and predictable for teams with large numbers of client users Clients can be added to projects at no additional cost, making it cost-effective for agency and SaaS onboarding workflows The platform served as an effective personalized documentation and training center, with clients actively using every feature > > **Desvantagens**: The Basecamp 5 migration has been the worst product update experience in years of use dating back to Basecamp Classic Dozens of process-breaking workflow changes shipped with no opt-out or legacy mode Admin control over participant notification settings was removed; users must now manage their own notification preferences per project individually, destroying any ability to manage this at scale across hundreds of projects Project list access, archived items, templates, lineup, and other frequently used features were buried behind search bars and nested menus with no direct navigation Support response to every reported issue has been a consistent "sorry, that's the way it is now," with no acknowledgment that the changes broke real workflows > > The Basecamp 5 update has been the worst update migration experience and I've been a user since Basecamp classic. The number of process breaking changes are so long, we stopped tracking them. Basecamp's response, across the board, to each support request has been "sorry, that's the way it is now." ----- ### "Not the most user-friendly app" — 3.0/5 > **Caitie** | *27 de março de 2026* | Saúde, bem-estar e condicionamento físico | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: I didn't find basecamp to be very user friendly, the interface is a bit scattered and confusing, and I didn't like the way it was organized. > > **Desvantagens**: The interface, the difficulty of finding where things were, and the constant confusion when trying to navigate within the app. > > I wasn't impressed with basecamp overall. As mentioned I had a tough time finding where things were and staying organized in the app. ----- ### "The simple project management system a hectic billing team can at least stick with." — 4.0/5 > **Frank** | *26 de abril de 2026* | Artigos de luxo e joias | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: All my team will need to work with is in one location and no one will need a tutorial to locate it. Such simplicity is actually worth something when individuals are working on things and not on learning software. > > **Desvantagens**: Experienced two annoying bugs when sharing files with the team, where the attachments could not load. A glitch like that is difficult to ignore in a billing environment where accuracy of documents is a concern. > > Basecamp has introduced a serene organization to our project organization process at Kilarys. The calendar enables the financial deadlines to be visible and the flat pricing reduced the internal budget dialogue to a very short one. ----- Page: 1 / 578\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/56808/basecamp?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pt/software/56808/basecamp) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data