--- description: Tudo sobre LILT: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários graças à Capterra Portugal. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: LILT - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Portugal 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software de Tradução](/directory/30934/translation-management/software) > [LILT](/software/204322/lilt) # LILT Canonical: https://www.capterra.pt/software/204322/lilt Page: 1 / 5\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/204322/lilt?page=2) > O Lilt gera conteúdo de alta qualidade e tempos de resposta mais rápidos com serviços e softwares de tradução baseados em humanos e habilitados para IA. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 85 users. Top-rated for **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa LILT? O Lilt atende a clientes em tecnologia empresarial e de consumo, varejo e comércio eletrônico, manufatura, jogos, serviços financeiros, saúde e governo. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Classificação | Detail | | **Geral** | **4.4/5** | 85 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recursos | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: LILT ## Commercial Context - **Target Audience**: Profissional autônomo, 201 - 500, 501 - 1 000, 1 001 - 5 000, 5 001 - 10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (local) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Available Countries**: Estados Unidos ## Recursos - Automatização de processos e fluxos de trabalho - Automação da localização - Ferramentas de colaboração - Gerenciamento de documentos - Gestão de projetos - Gestão de terminologia - Gestão do fluxo de trabalho - Importação/exportação de dados - Portal de autoatendimento - Rastreamento do projeto - Reconhecimento de voz - Third-Party Integrations - Tradução automática - Vários idiomas ## Integrations (28 total) - Adobe Commerce - Adobe Experience Manager - Box - Braze - CaptionHub - Contentful - Crowdin - Drupal - Figma - Git - GitHub - GitLab - Google Cloud - Google Drive - Helpshift ... and 13 more integrations ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Bate-papo ## Category - [Software de Tradução](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30934/translation-management/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Software de Tradução](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30934/translation-management/software) - [Software de Inteligência Artificial](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30938/artificial-intelligence/software) - [Software Governamental](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/20048/government/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Crowdin](https://www.capterra.pt/software/163509/crowdin) — 4.7/5 (176 reviews) 2. [Google Translate](https://www.capterra.pt/software/1013631/google-translate) — 4.5/5 (690 reviews) 3. [Bureau Works](https://www.capterra.pt/software/189130/bureau-works) — 4.8/5 (118 reviews) 4. [DeepL Pro](https://www.capterra.pt/software/219412/deepl-pro) — 4.7/5 (155 reviews) 5. [Tolgee](https://www.capterra.pt/software/1039225/tolgee) — 4.6/5 (95 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "One of my favorite work providers" — 4.0/5 > **Michelle** | *11 de abril de 2025* | Redação e edição de texto | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The PMs are friendly, and the platform is clean and intuitive. > > **Desvantagens**: Task assignments are often first come, first served, which may be annoying. Also, I think this may lead to poorer outputs as the translators assigned may not be that versed in those tasks/domains. > > I have worked at Lilt for quite a few years and hope to keep adding, as it's one of my best work providers. I like its professionals and tools, as well as its consistency in payments. ----- ### "Happy to work with and willing to be part of" — 5.0/5 > **Michele Fardini Soares 👩🏻‍💻 ⚙️ 💡** | *4 de abril de 2025* | Tradução e localização | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The opportunity to work with different accounts and fields. I can utilize my skills in the Life Sciences for one task, but in another, I can apply my skills to technology, the music industry, and social media. I have been learning a lot because I can exercise and gain new knowledge from this experience, as I am always willing to grow. > > **Desvantagens**: When I receive an email from LILT announcing a project to work on, and after some milliseconds, it is already unavailable. It's frustrating, and I got upset. It is almost impossible to get the job. I try to do it on my smartphone (iPhone), but I often have page errors, telling me that Chrome, Safari, Mozilla, and other browsers are not compatible. I have already reported this issue to PMs and support, but I continue experiencing problems. Additionally, I would like to inform you about the payment terms. It took too much time to complete the job—some of them, more than 45 days. > > I am proud to work for LILT. I already know many people from the team, and I received support; everyone helped when it was necessary. I have consistently demonstrated my interest in being part of the LILT team. As an engineer passionate about technology and language, I have a clear plan to utilize my knowledge of project management to become a Project Manager at LILT. I hope to join the LILT team, working remotely and collaborating with a team. ----- ### "Make Lilt a Better Place for Translators and Clients" — 5.0/5 > **Ning** | *5 de abril de 2025* | Tradução e localização | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Quick AI-enhanced TM-based machine tanslation and reliable and transparent payments. > > **Desvantagens**: 1. The least I like about Lilt is its current task assignment mechanism, a first-come, first-served system triggered by email notifications. Seemingly simple and straightforward, it fosters an environment prone to inefficiency and potential abuse. This system incentivizes a "race to the bottom," where translators may accept projects exceeding their expertise or available time simply to secure work. This ultimately risks delivering subpar translations, harming both client satisfaction and the platform's reputation. Furthermore, the reliance on speed of response opens the door for sophisticated bots or scripts to automatically claim assignments, leaving qualified human translators at a disadvantage. This undermines fair competition and potentially leads to a decline in overall translation quality. 2. Another annoying thing is that sometimes inconsistence can be found among accepted TMs. > > My experience with Lilt has been positive on the whole. The platform's interface is intuitive and user-friendly, particularly the in-context editor which allows for efficient translation. The payment system is generally reliable and transparent, which is crucial for freelancers. Finally, the availability of various project types and clients offers some degree of diversification in workload. The one thing I think needs to be improved is its task assignment mechanism. A more sophisticated approach would prioritize factors beyond speed of response. A system incorporating translator profiles, skills matching, and project-specific qualifications would be fairer, more efficient, and ultimately contribute to higher-quality translations. ----- ### "A good concept where some things fail" — 3.0/5 > **Thomas** | *6 de abril de 2025* | Tradução e localização | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The Contextual AI engine works really well, and the payments are allways on time. > > **Desvantagens**: Project teams raffle many jobs, who is the fastes in accepting gets the Job. This creates an atmosphere of competition instead a team consciousness. > > The tool works well, the job lists are a bit unclear, the jobs change their position each time you open them. Quality of fuzzy matches is often low, so I have the impression that quality control in German is failing. Seems there is no competent linguistic instance to oversee overall quality- ----- ### "A Smart and Translator-Friendly Platform" — 5.0/5 > **Leo** | *4 de abril de 2025* | Tradução e localização | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: What I appreciate most about Lilt is how its AI actually learns from me as I translate. It doesn’t just throw generic suggestions—it starts adapting to my style, which makes my work faster and more natural. The interface is clean, easy to use, and doesn’t get in the way of my workflow. Plus, I’ve never had any issues with payments—they’re always on time, which is something every freelancer values. > > **Desvantagens**: There are times when the platform lags, especially with larger files, which can be frustrating when I’m working on a tight deadline. I also wish there were more options for managing glossaries—sometimes I need more control over terminology to match specific client preferences. > > Lilt has been a great platform to work with. The AI assistance helps speed up my workflow without making me feel like I’m losing control over my translations. It’s not perfect—no tool is—but it’s one of the few platforms that actually feels like it’s working with me rather than just giving me suggestions to correct. If they keep improving the system and adding more flexibility, it could become an even stronger tool for professional translators. ----- Page: 1 / 5\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/204322/lilt?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pt/software/204322/lilt) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data