--- description: Tudo sobre IronMQ: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários graças à Capterra Portugal. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: IronMQ - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Portugal 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Programas para Desenvolver Aplicativos](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [IronMQ](/software/182241/ironmq) # IronMQ Canonical: https://www.capterra.pt/software/182241/ironmq Page: 1 / 2\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/182241/ironmq?page=2) > Uma fila altamente escalável e elástica de mensagens, fornecendo um sistema de passagem de mensagens extremamente rápido e robusto com implantações flexíveis. > > Verdict: Rated **4.3/5** by 26 users. Top-rated for **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa IronMQ? O IronMQ é altamente flexível em termos de implantação e escalabilidade; portanto, os clientes variam de empresas de pequeno e médio porte até empresas da Fortune 50. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Classificação | Detail | | **Geral** | **4.3/5** | 26 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Relação qualidade/preço | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recursos | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 70% | (7/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: Iron.io - **Location**: Las Vegas, EUA - **Founded**: 2014 ## Commercial Context - **Preço inicial**: 24,99 US$ - **Modelo de preços**: (Teste Grátis) - **Target Audience**: Profissional autônomo, 2 - 10, 11 - 50, 51 - 200, 201 - 500, 501 - 1 000, 1 001 - 5 000, 5 001 - 10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Available Countries**: Alemanha, Austrália, Brasil, Canadá, China, Estados Unidos, Japão, México, Reino Unido, Índia ## Recursos - API ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Suporte por telefone - Assistência 24/7 ## Category - [Programas para Desenvolver Aplicativos](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Salesforce Platform](https://www.capterra.pt/software/164356/app-cloud) — 4.4/5 (392 reviews) 2. [Domo](https://www.capterra.pt/software/119119/domo) — 4.3/5 (329 reviews) 3. [MuleSoft Anypoint Platform](https://www.capterra.pt/software/130185/anypoint-platform) — 4.4/5 (573 reviews) 4. [Zapier](https://www.capterra.pt/software/130182/zapier) — 4.7/5 (3043 reviews) 5. [Apify](https://www.capterra.pt/software/150854/apify) — 4.8/5 (416 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Efficiency is the name of the game" — 5.0/5 > **Ryan** | *15 de fevereiro de 2019* | Internet | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: We run a pretty lean startup and need to offload as much development operations as possible. We looked at AWS of course and discovered IronMQ to be the right balance of functionality, ease-of-use, and cost. The Worker and MessageQueue products are particularly top-notch. > > **Desvantagens**: It was difficult to migrate off of our existing infrastructure but the team at Iron tried hard to ease the pain. There's probably no way around it. Not everything will transfer seamlessly but we were able to do it with minimal downtime. > > We process millions of jobs a month and needed a way to scale outside of running our own Sidekiq instance. Worker and MessageQueue were the team that solved it for us. ----- ### "Set up a push queue in few minutes" — 5.0/5 > **Jose** | *15 de fevereiro de 2019* | Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Very easy to set up projects, queues, subscribers. Good value for money. > > **Desvantagens**: The company seems to be quite focused on IronWorker and the product plans do not contemplate a low-volume case when you just need a cloud-hosted push queue server to distribute amongs subscribers. Documentation on local setup with Docker is limited. > > We needed a cloud-hosted push queue to distribute work across several worker nodes that we were hosting and ironMQ was the perfect solution. The Node.js sdk allowed us to set up very quickly the necessary code to send the jobs requests, and then you just need to set up your queue to push your messages to these subscribed workers. Another feature we liked was the availability of some Docker images that mimicked the authentication and queue behaviour for testing locally. We've used extensively in our docker-compose stacks. ----- ### "Evaluate with great caution and care before committing" — 2.0/5 > **Ezekiel** | *15 de fevereiro de 2019* | Internet | Recommendation rating: 0.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: - Signed up on a free plan - Integrated easily with Heroku > > **Desvantagens**: - Randomly lost queues several times during THEIR outages - Very slow performance - Horrible support; sometimes WEEKS without response - Horrible documentation -- out of date, incomplete, etc. - Minimal feature set -- not even close to competitors - Terrible, buggy UI online > > IronMQ at the time was the simplest integration for our small PHP Laravel app on Heroku. We are still stuck on it despite having grown significantly. Even when we were small we faced myriad horrible technical issues that should never happen with any production 3rd party service -- loss of data, frequent outages, god awful performance, buggy UI causing you to have to revert to your own API usage for simple queue management tasks, etc. I would never put it past a company to improve over time so I won't just tell you to run away as fast as you can, but SERIOUSLY if you ever are actually considering using Iron or someone tries to convince you to use it, you should be prepared to justify that decision against very mature, very serious competition at this point. Queuing is more or less a solved problem including managed solutions in the cloud; Iron doesn't hold a candle to the competition at this point in time. ----- ### "IronMQ let us quickly get to solving the problems that really mattered for our company" — 5.0/5 > **Avaliador Verificado** | *15 de fevereiro de 2019* | Hotelaria | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: IronMQ was simple to implement in our system. We use it for a number of use cases and find it reliable, fast, and easy to use. > > **Desvantagens**: I can't think of any specific issue we've had with IronMQ. When we first started we organized things in an awkward way which lead to a large number of projects appearing on the dashboard when logging into Iron. That was mostly our own fault though. ----- ### "Interaction with go driver is great\!" — 5.0/5 > **Diego** | *15 de fevereiro de 2019* | Gestão de investimentos | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: How easy it was to get up and running. At least the Go driver let's you put your config files in several places, following a hierarchy to override one value or another. > > **Desvantagens**: This will sound like a fake review but my experience was just very good with IronMQ, there wasn't anything I needed that wasn't there. > > I wrote a search engine that had to coordinate several crawlers. I used IronMQ because I didn't want to setup any of the other message queues. I wrote my app in Go, and the go driver to talk to IronMQ was well designed, easy to follow examples on their site. The dashboard gives you enough info to debug any issues. Really good experience. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/182241/ironmq?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pt/software/182241/ironmq) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data