--- description: Tudo sobre Shelby Arena: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários graças à Capterra Portugal. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Shelby Arena - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Portugal 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Sistemas para Igrejas](/directory/20046/church-management/software) > [Shelby Arena](/software/175655/arena) # Shelby Arena Canonical: https://www.capterra.pt/software/175655/arena Page: 1 / 3\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/175655/arena?page=2) > O Shelby Arena é um grande sistema de gestão de igreja com compatibilidade completa com o software de doação, membros e contabilidade Shelby. > > Verdict: Rated **4.0/5** by 38 users. Top-rated for **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa Shelby Arena? Igrejas que gostariam de uma solução personalizada de gestão e têm uma equipe dedicada para gerenciar essa solução robusta. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Classificação | Detail | | **Geral** | **4.0/5** | 38 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 3.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Relação qualidade/preço | 3.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recursos | 3.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 70% | (7/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: Ministry Brands - **Founded**: 2005 ## Commercial Context - **Preço inicial**: 449,00 US$ - **Target Audience**: 11 - 50, 51 - 200, 201 - 500, 501 - 1 000, 1 001 - 5 000, 5 001 - 10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Windows (desktop) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Available Countries**: Estados Unidos ## Recursos - Administração de pequenos grupos - Calendário online - Comunicação com associados - Controle de comparecimento - Diretório de associados - Doações online - Gestão de associação - Gestão de compromissos - Gestão de doações - Gestão de eventos - Gestão de voluntariado - Integração da contabilidade ## Opções de suporte - Bate-papo ## Category - [Sistemas para Igrejas](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/20046/church-management/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Chmeetings](https://www.capterra.pt/software/184192/chmeetings) — 4.9/5 (154 reviews) 2. [Clearstream](https://www.capterra.pt/software/158103/clearstream) — 4.8/5 (656 reviews) 3. [Tithely Church Management](https://www.capterra.pt/software/132513/breeze-chms) — 4.8/5 (623 reviews) 4. [ChurchTrac](https://www.capterra.pt/software/125787/churchtrac) — 4.8/5 (859 reviews) 5. [Planning Center](https://www.capterra.pt/software/76708/planning-center) — 4.7/5 (1137 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Excellent database" — 5.0/5 > **Vicki** | *16 de agosto de 2019* | Gestão de organizações sem fins lucrativos | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Customizable Comprehensive Moderately easy to learn to use and teach. > > **Desvantagens**: must have a developer to make many design changes. > > Overall I have had a great experience with Arena and would highly recommend it. The more we use it, the more we learn, the more we can do with it. ----- ### "A long history of stability and scalability" — 4.0/5 > **Christopher** | *11 de novembro de 2020* | Instituições religiosas | Recommendation rating: 3.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Arena allowed us to track congregants and have them sign up for events and more easily track and record donations. It gave us a single place to store congregant data, and to provide our congregation with a single username and password for everything our church did online. > > **Desvantagens**: It was not as easily customizable as we would like, and many of the issues we had couldn't be resolved by support. It felt like the features it came with out of the box determined what we could do. We ultimately switched away from it after a few years of use. > > Overall we were able to get many things accomplished with our ministry to kick start a new era of tracking and managing congregant data, and were able to directly import check donations including scanned copies. We were also able to provide online event registration for the first time. Despite our issues with it, I still am glad we chose it over many of the other systems we were also evaluating at the time. ----- ### "Way behind the times" — 2.0/5 > **Avaliador Verificado** | *1 de novembro de 2018* | Instituições religiosas | Recommendation rating: 0.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: If you're using arena, it's probably because you used Shelby - they'll port your info from your old Shelby account making it easier to move from one system to the other. It is web based and it generally functions as a decent database. > > **Desvantagens**: If Shelby classic was stuck in the 1990s Arena is stuck in the early 2000's - Shelby is at least ten years behind with everything they do. The small groups search function isn't really useful and doesn't look good when integrated into a well-designed website. All the interfaces are archaic and difficult to use. It isn't intuitive or forward thinking in its interface. It seems stuck in the 80s and 90s when it comes to its way of thinking. It has no worship planning component, no event planning component, no options for creating calendars that are accessible or visible to the public. (though if it did have those features I have no doubt they would be difficult to use and unattractive.) Anyone who is knowledgeable about modern church management software will hate everything Shelby produces. > > The people at Shelby are nice people, they just aren't up with the times. If they could get ahead and make things easier to use and more attractive or just add simple things like making their group search feature customization so it could be integrated into your existing website's design - and making everything platform agnostic so it would easier to use on tablets and phones, then they'd be halfway there. They're just so far behind and still not catching up that I would really recommend against putting your church management needs in their hands, because if you do you'll be stuck there. ----- ### "Shelby Next Membership Review" — 4.0/5 > **Sandi** | *7 de fevereiro de 2020* | Instituições religiosas | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Ease of use for both admin and membership. > > **Desvantagens**: Transition from previous software was a little rocky. Took too long. > > Great customer service\! Prompt and knowledgeable. It has streamlined our processes for tracking membership and visitors. ----- ### "Arena allows our large staff to work together and mutually benefit each other in productivity." — 5.0/5 > **Cara** | *22 de maio de 2018* | Instituições religiosas | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: It is flexible and allows us to categorize things according to our needs. Maintaining records can be effectively done by a number of people, which in turn benefits the whole organization and makes communication and other work efficient. Maintaining family relationships is easy and clear. Each ministry can have its section but work is done similarly so cross training is easy. Security is specific and granular so it is easy manage the access people have. It is easy to see how people are involved and connect with them according to their interests. The Members Responsive Portal allows congregation participants to manage their personal information, register for events and connect to volunteer positions. All of that updates their records and their record shows their own activity. God's work in this world is supported and furthered because our staff works with a common purpose. The data work is done once, in one place and all are blessed by up-to-date shared information. Development is strong > > **Desvantagens**: The best part of Arena is also its hardest part - its ability to be customized. Each instance of Arena is unique. It takes a lot of work to move in and get ministries set to work efficiently. It takes a strong lead person to have a vision that gets the whole staff working together and moving in the same direction. Ministries are often used to working in isolation from each other. If they don't learn how to standardize the way they work so the whole organization works the same way, everyone fails. Following direction of the trainers is paramount\! Incorrect set up of check in, group structure, etc. causes huge headaches and wastes time. Without a well developed strategy for setting up Arena it doesn't work. Strong guidance is needed for efficient set up. Communicating with PARENTS (or split households) of students who are connected to groups or tags is not effective. Custom procedures are needed to do this easily. > > Working with a common purpose as a whole staff. After getting all of the ministries working with a common goal and unified processes work became more efficient and understandable to staff members. It truly helps us work to support God's work in our world. ----- Page: 1 / 3\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/175655/arena?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pt/software/175655/arena) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data