--- description: Tudo sobre BrowserStack: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários graças à Capterra Portugal. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: BrowserStack - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Portugal 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Ferramentas para Testes Automatizados](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/162900/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.capterra.pt/software/162900/browserstack Page: 1 / 32\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) > Plataforma de teste entre navegadores para desenvolvedores que permite testar aplicativos móveis e sites. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 775 users. Top-rated for **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa BrowserStack? A resposta curta: qualquer pessoa que projete/desenvolva para a Internet aberta. Você não precisa conhecer codificação para usar as ferramentas interativas de teste entre navegadores. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Classificação | Detail | | **Geral** | **4.6/5** | 775 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recursos | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: BrowserStack - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Preço inicial**: 39,00 US$ - **Modelo de preços**: (Free version available) (Teste Grátis) - **Target Audience**: Profissional autônomo, 2 - 10, 11 - 50, 51 - 200, 201 - 500, 501 - 1 000, 1 001 - 5 000, 5 001 - 10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Available Countries**: Alemanha, Austrália, Brasil, Canadá, Dinamarca, Emirados Árabes Unidos, Estados Unidos, Ilhas Virgens Britânicas, Ilhas Virgens dos EUA, Irlanda, Israel, México, Reino Unido, Singapura, África do Sul, Índia ## Recursos - Alertas/notificações - Anotações - Arquivo morto e retenção - Automated Testing - Avaliações de roteiros de teste - Cenários de carga - Controle de defeitos - Controle de qualidade - Controle de versões - Controles/permissões de acesso - Detecção de anomalias - Ferramentas de colaboração - Gerenciamento de documentos - Gerenciamento de repositórios - Gerenciamento de testes de software - Gestão de auditorias - Gestão de incidentes - Gestão de projetos - Gestão de requisitos - Gestão de testes - Gestão do desempenho - Gestão do fluxo de trabalho - Gestão do risco - Gravação/transcrição de vídeo - Identificação de gargalos - Indicadores de desempenho - Integração contínua - Monitoramento - Monitoramento de atividades - Multiple Test Types - Métricas quantitativas - Questionários e feedback - Rastreabilidade - Rastreamento de conformidade - Rastreamento de edição - Registro de auditoria - Relatórios e análise de dados - Scripts de teste - Segmentação por público - Supervisão de rede - Suporte para execução paralela - Teste de performance - Testes de carga - Testes na Internet - Testes por celular - Visualização de dados - Visualização hierárquica ## Integrations (16 total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... and 1 more integrations ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Suporte por telefone - Bate-papo ## Category - [Ferramentas para Testes Automatizados](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Ferramentas para Testes Automatizados](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Software de Controle de Erros de Programação](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [Software de Testes de Usuário](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Software de Testes de Carga](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/32135/load-testing/software) - [Ferramentas de Gerenciamento de Testes](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Alternativas 1. [TestRail](https://www.capterra.pt/software/128204/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 2. [Userbrain](https://www.capterra.pt/software/141082/userbrain) — 4.2/5 (88 reviews) 3. [Userlytics](https://www.capterra.pt/software/181202/userlytics) — 4.7/5 (55 reviews) 4. [Hotjar](https://www.capterra.pt/software/163516/hotjar) — 4.6/5 (545 reviews) 5. [Tricentis qTest](https://www.capterra.pt/software/173762/qtest) — 4.4/5 (27 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "A Reliable Platform for Cross-Browser Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Sofia** | *21 de agosto de 2025* | Serviços de informação | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Ease of Use \& Accessibility: I liked how easy it was to quickly access different browsers and devices without any setup. It made cross-browser testing much more efficient. Device \& Browser Coverage: I appreciated the wide range of real devices and browsers available—it gave me confidence that our product was tested in real-world conditions. > > **Desvantagens**: Sometimes the sessions could feel a little slow or laggy, especially on certain devices. Debugging complex issues sometimes felt limited compared to using local tools. > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It streamlined cross-browser and cross-device testing for my team, saved us setup time, and gave us confidence that our product worked in real-world conditions. While there’s some room for improvement in speed and device availability, it’s been a reliable and valuable tool for ensuring quality. ----- ### "A unique product that pays off" — 4.0/5 > **José** | *21 de agosto de 2024* | Jogos e cassinos | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The diversity of the available devices and the amount of stuff that you can test with them. > > **Desvantagens**: The user expecience can be a bit clunky and the documentation for the Automation API does not seem to work 100%. > > I use Browserstack to test how well my company's web-based game work accross multiple devices/browsers, be it manually opening the game or using automated testing. Although not very easy to set up, the automated testing features are excelent\! ----- ### "Fast and Efficient Browser Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Yash** | *9 de julho de 2026* | Serviços e tecnologia da informação | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: BrowserStack is easy to use and offers excellent browser and device coverage for efficient cross-browser testing. It saves time by quickly identifying compatibility issues across different environments. > > **Desvantagens**: The pricing can be expensive for smaller teams, and remote sessions may occasionally experience slight lag. Some advanced features also take time for new users to learn. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very good. It's a reliable and user-friendly platform that makes cross-browser testing fast and efficient. ----- ### "The Unfair Advantage Every QA/Automation Team Deserves" — 5.0/5 > **Yogesh** | *2 de abril de 2026* | Química | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Five years on the enterprise plan and the one thing I like most is how BrowserStack completely removes infrastructure as a problem. Real devices with SIM support, thousands of browser and OS combinations, instant availability, no maintenance overhead. App Live and App Automate work seamlessly with Selenium, Appium, Playwright and most of automation tools without any complex setup. Parallel execution is significantly faster than any self hosted grid I have managed. The newly released no code low code testing is also best, accessibility testing and visual regression tools are production ready and not just checkboxes. For an enterprise team this is the best investment in the testing stack. > > **Desvantagens**: Pricing is the one honest gripe. BrowserStack is worth every rupee but it is not cheap, and for smaller teams or startups the enterprise plan can feel like a stretch. Parallel session limits on lower tiers push you to upgrade faster than expected and when your team scales quickly, the cost scales with it in a way that requires a conversation with finance every renewal cycle. > > BrowserStack did not just improve our testing workflow, It transformed how our entire engineering culture thinks about quality. The chaos before was real. Flaky emulators, inconsistent local device setups, test results that meant nothing because the environment was never stable. Onboarding a new automation tool meant weeks of configuration, compatibility debugging and infrastructure work before a single meaningful test ran. From day one on the BS plan the difference was visible. Real devices, real browsers, real network conditions, available instantly, every single time. No queues, no "device is offline," no environment drift. The confidence in our test results changed overnight because the platform underneath them was finally reliable. Across multiple automation tools integration experience has been consistently smooth. Switching frameworks mid project did not mean rebuilding infrastructure, It meant updating a config and moving on. That kind of flexibility is rare and genuinely underappreciated until you have worked without it. App Live became the go to for exploratory testing on real devices with SIM support. App Automate handled mobile regression at a scale and speed a physical device lab three times our budget could not have matched. The freedom to choose between virtual and real devices depending on the test objective gave us precision we simply did not have before. The no code and low code capabilities brought manual QA members directly into the automation process, accessibility testing and visual regression are now standard pipeline stages, not separate afterthought tools. Everything lives in one platform, reporting is unified and session management gives complete visibility into what ran, when and exactly why something failed. Enterprise support has been a genuine partner throughout, Issues resolved by people who actually understand automation deeply, not generic ticket handlers. There is a reason it remains the one tool in the stack that has never been up for replacement. It is not just a platform, it is the foundation our entire quality process is built on. ----- ### "Okay, but not the best for Test Management" — 3.0/5 > **Jess** | *2 de abril de 2026* | Software | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: They have the right idea with Test Management but the execution is a little iffy. For example the drag and drop for copying a test case will work for a bit, then stop. Their support team is top tier. > > **Desvantagens**: The bugs, the execution of Test Management is a little iffy. For example the drag and drop for copying a test case will work for a bit, then stop. > > Overall its neutral. We ended up switching to Qase for better/cheaper AI test case creation. BrowserStacks support team has been great through the various issues but we did run into a lot of issues. ----- Page: 1 / 32\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pt/software/162900/browserstack) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data