--- description: Tudo sobre BrowserStack: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários graças à Capterra Portugal. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: BrowserStack - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Portugal 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Ferramentas para Testes Automatizados](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/162900/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.capterra.pt/software/162900/browserstack Page: 1 / 32\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) > Plataforma de teste entre navegadores para desenvolvedores que permite testar aplicativos móveis e sites. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 766 users. Top-rated for **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa BrowserStack? A resposta curta: qualquer pessoa que projete/desenvolva para a Internet aberta. Você não precisa conhecer codificação para usar as ferramentas interativas de teste entre navegadores. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Classificação | Detail | | **Geral** | **4.6/5** | 766 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recursos | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: BrowserStack - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Preço inicial**: 39,00 US$ - **Modelo de preços**: (Free version available) (Teste Grátis) - **Target Audience**: Profissional autônomo, 2 - 10, 11 - 50, 51 - 200, 201 - 500, 501 - 1 000, 1 001 - 5 000, 5 001 - 10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Available Countries**: Alemanha, Austrália, Brasil, Canadá, Dinamarca, Emirados Árabes Unidos, Estados Unidos, Ilhas Virgens Britânicas, Ilhas Virgens dos EUA, Irlanda, Israel, México, Reino Unido, Singapura, África do Sul, Índia ## Recursos - Alertas/notificações - Anotações - Arquivo morto e retenção - Automated Testing - Avaliações de roteiros de teste - Cenários de carga - Controle de defeitos - Controle de qualidade - Controle de versões - Controles/permissões de acesso - Detecção de anomalias - Ferramentas de colaboração - Gerenciamento de documentos - Gerenciamento de repositórios - Gerenciamento de testes de software - Gestão de auditorias - Gestão de incidentes - Gestão de projetos - Gestão de requisitos - Gestão de testes - Gestão do desempenho - Gestão do fluxo de trabalho - Gestão do risco - Gravação/transcrição de vídeo - Identificação de gargalos - Indicadores de desempenho - Integração contínua - Monitoramento - Monitoramento de atividades - Multiple Test Types - Métricas quantitativas - Questionários e feedback - Rastreabilidade - Rastreamento de conformidade - Rastreamento de edição - Registro de auditoria - Relatórios e análise de dados - Scripts de teste - Segmentação por público - Supervisão de rede - Suporte para execução paralela - Teste de performance - Testes de carga - Testes na Internet - Testes por celular - Visualização de dados - Visualização hierárquica ## Integrations (16 total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... and 1 more integrations ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Suporte por telefone - Bate-papo ## Category - [Ferramentas para Testes Automatizados](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Ferramentas para Testes Automatizados](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Software de Controle de Erros de Programação](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [Software de Testes de Usuário](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Software de Testes de Carga](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/32135/load-testing/software) - [Ferramentas de Gerenciamento de Testes](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Alternativas 1. [TestRail](https://www.capterra.pt/software/128204/testrail) — 4.3/5 (177 reviews) 2. [Userlytics](https://www.capterra.pt/software/181202/userlytics) — 4.7/5 (55 reviews) 3. [Userbrain](https://www.capterra.pt/software/141082/userbrain) — 4.2/5 (88 reviews) 4. [Testsigma](https://www.capterra.pt/software/171626/testsigma) — 4.3/5 (19 reviews) 5. [Hotjar](https://www.capterra.pt/software/163516/hotjar) — 4.6/5 (539 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Ótima ferramenta" — 5.0/5 > **Marcos** | *14 de agosto de 2024* | Internet | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Adorei a parte de fazer testes reais em dispositivos físicos e a grande quantidade de aparelho e notebooks. > > **Desvantagens**: Na assinatura mais barata não instala vpn. > > Sou QA e uso muito o BrowserStack para simular os meus testes em dispositivos físicos reais, isso agiliza e ajuda muito a equipe tanto no desenvolvimento e na entrega com mais qualidade. ----- ### "A Reliable Platform for Cross-Browser Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Sofia** | *21 de agosto de 2025* | Serviços de informação | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Ease of Use \& Accessibility: I liked how easy it was to quickly access different browsers and devices without any setup. It made cross-browser testing much more efficient. Device \& Browser Coverage: I appreciated the wide range of real devices and browsers available—it gave me confidence that our product was tested in real-world conditions. > > **Desvantagens**: Sometimes the sessions could feel a little slow or laggy, especially on certain devices. Debugging complex issues sometimes felt limited compared to using local tools. > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It streamlined cross-browser and cross-device testing for my team, saved us setup time, and gave us confidence that our product worked in real-world conditions. While there’s some room for improvement in speed and device availability, it’s been a reliable and valuable tool for ensuring quality. ----- ### "A unique product that pays off" — 4.0/5 > **José** | *21 de agosto de 2024* | Jogos e cassinos | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The diversity of the available devices and the amount of stuff that you can test with them. > > **Desvantagens**: The user expecience can be a bit clunky and the documentation for the Automation API does not seem to work 100%. > > I use Browserstack to test how well my company's web-based game work accross multiple devices/browsers, be it manually opening the game or using automated testing. Although not very easy to set up, the automated testing features are excelent\! ----- ### "Reliable Cross Browser Testing Tool - Browserstack" — 5.0/5 > **Yash** | *2 de abril de 2026* | Serviços e tecnologia da informação | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: - I can test on alomst any real iphone or android model without needing the physical hardwhere. - It makes it very easy to test my local dev env even when i'm behind a company's VPN. - It works well with our existing Playwright and Pyhton automation scripts. > > **Desvantagens**: - There's often a big lag between my mouse click \& the remote devide responding. - It can take 20 30 sec, just to start a session, which feels slow when you are in a hurry. - It's definitely on the expensive side, especially when you start adding parallel testing slots for the team. > > It's a good tool that has become a part of our workflow. It helps us catch CSS bugs and layout issues on mobile Safari that we just can't see on desktop emulators. While the speed could be better and the cost is high, the reliability of testing on real devices makes it worth it for a professional team. ----- ### "Simplifying Testing with Real Devices and Seamless Automation" — 4.0/5 > **Abin** | *24 de março de 2026* | Serviços e tecnologia da informação | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: What I like most about BrowserStack is how easily it brings everything together in one place. I can quickly access a wide range of real devices and browsers for live testing, which makes debugging much faster and more reliable without needing to manage physical devices(using Live and App Live), while also avoiding the overhead of maintaining an in-house device lab. At the same time, the platform fits well into our automation workflow with Automate and App Automate, allowing us to run tests in parallel and integrate with CI/CD without much effort. It also helps keep things organized with its test management capabilities, so tracking and maintaining test cases becomes easier. Overall, it has made the entire testing process smoother and more efficient, and whenever I’ve needed help, the support team has been responsive and useful. > > **Desvantagens**: One area where BrowserStack could improve is performance consistency at times, especially when using certain devices where sessions can feel slightly slow or laggy depending on network conditions. Also, while the platform offers a lot of features, it can take some time to fully explore and get comfortable with everything, especially for new users. Occasionally, debugging automation failures can require extra effort due to limited visibility compared to local environments. That said, these are relatively minor compared to the overall benefits the platform provides. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It makes both manual and automated testing easier by providing quick access to real devices and browsers, without the need for managing infrastructure. It fits well into daily workflows, from quick debugging to running automated tests, and has helped improve testing speed and efficiency. While there are occasional minor performance lags, it remains a reliable and valuable tool for the QA process. ----- Page: 1 / 32\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pt/software/162900/browserstack) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data