15 anos ajudando empresas portuguesas
a escolherem o melhor software

Conheça Shortcut

O Clubhouse é uma plataforma rápida e organizada de gestão de projetos para equipes de software Agile planejarem, criarem e lançarem produtos melhores. Ele combina a quantidade certa de simplicidade e estrutura para manter as equipes de software felizes e produtivas. O Clubhouse foi criado para desenvolvedores e oferece um conjunto robusto de integrações populares (GitHub, GitLab, Slack), além de uma API bem elaborada para automatizar fluxos de trabalho. Teste gratuitamente por 14 dias, sem necessidade de cartão de crédito.

Quem usa Shortcut?

O Clubhouse é ideal para equipes de software Agile de médio porte que buscam uma ferramenta de gestão de projetos estilo Kanban com recursos empresariais, mas que seja simples de configurar e usar.

Shortcut Software - 1
Shortcut Software - 2
Shortcut Software - 3
Shortcut Software - 4

Está em dúvida sobre o Shortcut? Compare com uma alternativa popular

Shortcut

Shortcut

4,6 (363)
8,50 US$
ano
Versão gratuita
Versão de teste gratuita
76
16
4,4 (363)
4,5 (363)
4,6 (363)
VS.
Preço inicial
Opções de preços
Recursos
Integrações
Praticidade
Relação qualidade/preço
Atendimento ao cliente
Nenhum preço encontrado
Versão gratuita
Versão de teste gratuita
43
1
4,4 (5 907)
4,6 (5 907)
4,4 (5 907)
As barras de classificação verdes mostram o produto vencedor com base na nota média e no número de avaliações.

Outras ótimas alternativas ao Shortcut

GitHub
Melhores recursos
Controle de fonte
Controles/permissões de acesso
Ferramentas de colaboração
Jira
Melhores recursos
Gestão de tarefas
Metodologias ágeis (Agile)
Planificação/Programação de projetos
Trello
Melhores recursos
Ferramentas de colaboração
Gestão de tarefas
Planificação/Programação de projetos
Agile CRM
Melhores recursos
Banco de dados de contatos
Gerenciamento de contatos
Gestão de leads
Shotcut
Melhores recursos
Arrastar e soltar
Compatibilidade com vários formatos
Edição de vídeo
Notion
Melhores recursos
Edição/atualização de tarefas
Gestão de tarefas
Planificação/Programação de projetos
Zenkit
Melhores recursos
Ferramentas de colaboração
Gestão de tarefas
Seguimento de relatórios/projetos
Pivotal Tracker
Melhores recursos
Gestão de tarefas
Planificação/Programação de projetos
Priorização
Kanban Tool
Melhores recursos
Controle do progresso de tarefas
Gestão de tarefas
Gestão virtual do fluxo de trabalho

Avaliações do Shortcut

Pontuação média

Geral
4,6
Praticidade
4,4
Atendimento ao cliente
4,6
Recursos
4,4
Relação qualidade/preço
4,5

Avaliações por tamanho de empresa (funcionários)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1 000
  • >1 001

Encontre avaliações segundo pontuações

5
64%
4
32%
3
4%
2
0%
Bryan
Bryan
Product Director, EUA
Usuário do LinkedIn Verificado
Design, 2 - 10 funcionários
Usou o software para: 6 a 12 meses
Fonte da avaliação

The perfect tool for software projects using Kanban

5,0 há 5 anos

Comentários: Clubhouse helps us manage agile software projects better than ever before. With other tools it feels like we are forcing it to try to accommodate our workflow, but with Clubhouse it feels like it was designed exactly for our use.

Vantagens:

Clubhouse brought us a new set of features and ways to organize stories and tasks that we didn't know we wanted/needed. We have always stuck with tools that were able to help improve our kanban based workflow rather than the simple project board tools like Trello that cater to everyone more than software/product development specifically. There are few tools out there that provide what we are looking for: the ability to organize and label stories with more granularity than a single label (estimates, types, project, priorities, epic, etc), and the ability to have reports like velocity and burndown charts.

Desvantagens:

It is a very small thing, but it would be nice if we could adjust the color scheme of both things like labels beyond the default options, as well as adjust the overall interface colors.

Lee-ann
Director of Business Systems, EUA
Publicidade e marketing, 51 - 200 funcionários
Usou o software para: 6 a 12 meses
Fonte da avaliação

Shortcut (previously Clubhouse) has been a great improvement for us.

5,0 há 2 anos

Comentários: Overall our experience has been great. Less has been falling through the cracks, and we're able to actively manage & prioritize our development with ease. The application is enjoyed by both the development team & the management team, so everyone is benefitting from our switch to Shortcut.

Vantagens:

1. The app is very easy to configure & set up. 2. The user experience is seamless & functionality is very self-explanatory. 3. There are multiple ways to configure each component, so you can set up the app according to what works best for you & your company. (No "one size fits all" model.) 4. The ability to set up different workflows for different departments has been a huge help for us.

Desvantagens:

1. It's a little hard to envision how each of the components should be set up for your organization when you're first getting in there (i.e., projects, workflows, milestones, epics, stories), so we ended up changing the setup as we went along after the initial configuration. This wasn't necessarily a bad thing, as it allowed us to improve the way we currently did things. 2. The biggest issue we have now, after using the app for a while, is that stories do not populate into the Gantt charts, only epics. This means if we have one-off tasks that are added as stories, those do not pull into the report we'd like. For that reason, we have to set up an entire epic just to set up a single story, for reporting purposes. I think it would be great if you had the option to pull the Gantt reports at the epic or story-level.

Avaliador Verificado
Usuário do LinkedIn Verificado
Software, 11 - 50 funcionários
Usou o software para: 1 a 5 meses
Fonte da avaliação

While Clubhouse can do some things well, it is lacking in many areas

2,0 há 5 anos

Comentários: My experience with Clubhouse was not great to say the least. While the UI is promising, and the price per user is much lower than others, you get what you pay for. Like too many other project management apps, there is not enough focus on the time being tracked vs a budget for the project you are working on. The project layers overlap in a way that would be good if you were working on individual projects for a larger product, but not if you are working on individual projects geared towards individual clients.

Vantagens:

I think the best part of Clubhouse is the robust API that can allow a dev team to add or complement to the existing platform. Clubhouse seems designed for teams focusing on a product or a small portfolio of similar products or complimentary features. It does not seem designed for a consulting or agency style development shop.

Desvantagens:

Clubhouse is lacking in a number of areas that should be expected features in agile project management software. Completion dates are buried, no project budgeting or hourly rates, no invoicing or adding expenses, time tracking, resource management, personal task lists, custom fields, dependencies. It also seemed overwhelming to get set up and running.

Fredrik
CEO, Suécia
Publicidade e marketing, 11 - 50 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de dois anos
Fonte da avaliação

Shortcut the Jira killer

5,0 há 4 meses

Comentários: Easy to get started with. Easy to use. Nice diagrams and overviews.

Vantagens:

It is extremely easy to use. Quick to setup and understand. VERY cost effective! The team behind Shortcut delivers new and exciting functionality often that really makes a difference.

Desvantagens:

I have not idea to be honest. There are really no bad parts of Shortcut for what it is doing! Nice integrations and easy to use, not really something you can dislike.

Thomas
Developer, EUA
Automotivo, 51 - 200 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de dois anos
Fonte da avaliação

Shortcut (formerly Clubhouse) is a great task management tool for development teams

5,0 há 2 anos

Vantagens:

Before switching to Shortcut, we used Jira. While Jira has plenty of features, we found it a bit cumbersome and the performance of the interface was atrocious (everything single task was incredibly slow, even the most basic activities had a noticeable delay). The first major benefit we saw with Shortcut was the speed of interaction - instead of waiting for the interface to catch up, we could just log in and get things done. The integrations with various source control platforms (we use the Gitlab integration) also helps keep task statuses up to date without even having to open the web interface. Overall the speed of the interface and the available integrations lead to a feeling that Shortcut never "gets in our way".

Desvantagens:

We started out paying for Shortcut (when it was still called Clubhouse), but were soon switched to a free plan without even having to ask. Although this was a nice gesture on their part, they then released a beta of their new product called Write. This beta is only available for paying users, which is understandable, but having been moved to a free plan meant we couldn't access it. This isn't a major issue, but starting our subscription back up would require going through the approval process with our accounting department again so we've just stayed on the free plan without access to Write so far.