--- description: Tudo sobre Plum: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários graças à Capterra Portugal. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Plum - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Portugal 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software de Provas de Seleção](/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) > [Plum](/software/150347/plum) # Plum Canonical: https://www.capterra.pt/software/150347/plum Page: 1 / 2\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/150347/plum?page=2) > Quatro vezes mais preditivo que um currículo, o Plum prevê quais pessoas têm maior potencial de sucesso em qualquer função, em qualquer empresa. > > Verdict: Rated **4.7/5** by 19 users. Top-rated for **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa Plum? O Plum é para qualquer empresa que precise de uma solução de contratação escalável em meio ao crescimento, esteja comprometida com a diversidade na aquisição de talentos ou precise migrar uma grande parte do quadro de funcionários devido à automação e IA. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Classificação | Detail | | **Geral** | **4.7/5** | 19 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recursos | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: Plum - **Location**: Waterloo, Canadá - **Founded**: 2012 ## Commercial Context - **Preço inicial**: 750,00 US$ - **Modelo de preços**: (Teste Grátis) - **Target Audience**: 11 - 50, 501 - 1 000, 1 001 - 5 000, 5 001 - 10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web - **Idiomas**: alemão, chinês, chinês tradicional, espanhol, francês, inglês, italiano, japonês, polaco, português - **Available Countries**: Alemanha, Austrália, Canadá, Estados Unidos, Reino Unido ## Recursos - Aquisição de talentos - Classificação automática - Comparação de candidatos - Gestão de avaliações - Gestão de candidatos - Planejamento de sucessões - Testes online ## Integrations (2 total) - Greenhouse - SAP SuccessFactors HCM ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Bate-papo ## Category - [Software de Provas de Seleção](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Software de Provas de Seleção](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) - [Software de Recrutamento](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30602/recruiting/software) - [Software de Planejamento de Sucessão](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30668/succession-planning/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Dayforce HCM](https://www.capterra.pt/software/114628/Dayforce-HCM) — 4.3/5 (1060 reviews) 2. [isolved](https://www.capterra.pt/software/164417/isolved) — 3.9/5 (646 reviews) 3. [Lattice](https://www.capterra.pt/software/151676/lattice) — 4.5/5 (205 reviews) 4. [UKG Pro](https://www.capterra.pt/software/480/ukg-pro) — 4.3/5 (719 reviews) 5. [Quantum Workplace](https://www.capterra.pt/software/150237/recognition) — 4.6/5 (154 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "We use PLUM for a stepping stone in our hiring process and it is a very helpful tool\!" — 4.0/5 > **Devon** | *27 de abril de 2018* | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: - Behavioral Analysis is great to filter candidates - Building an ideal candidate profile - Easy to sort through and determine which candidates are a good fit - Simple to use for the potential candidate > > **Desvantagens**: - Monthly pricing doesn't seem right for this type of software. A per-job pricing would be ideal for the way that we use it. - Account management is simple, but seems lacking on a few features - It would be nice to have another section or custom sections for different stages of the interview process rather than just "shortlisted" and "hired"... Many candidates go through several stages of the interview and sometimes want to keep track of that. > > The biggest benefit is to filter out 10s - 100s of candidates to fit a particular style of work that you are hiring for. It is a huge time saver for that feature alone. ----- ### "Fastest, the most accurate psychometric tool to date. Our organization did extensive research." — 5.0/5 > **Joshua (Grades)** | *17 de julho de 2018* | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The ability to save exponential amounts of time on screening candidates for our roles. The ability to understand humans more and more after reviewing their profiles. > > **Desvantagens**: The length of time can be challenging for some people but as long as it's presented properly, it shouldn't be an issue. A lot of the competition have 2-3 hour tests while this is 30-40 minutes. > > Ability to pinpoint the exact types of personality for our team' desires. Timeline to shorten our screening process with 1000s of resumes. ----- ### "Useful assessment tool" — 3.0/5 > **Dawne** | *16 de outubro de 2018* | Indústria farmacêutica | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: ability to assign candidates to different jobs > > **Desvantagens**: template incompatibility with our email software ----- ### "Nice insights, not so nice service" — 4.0/5 > **Jeff** | *16 de janeiro de 2020* | Construção | Recommendation rating: 3.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: As personality profiles go, plum is really nice. Interesting text descriptions of the person and the match rating system is easy to understand. > > **Desvantagens**: Be careful\! If you change an applicant to hired plum counts them against your hiring limit regardless of the reason. While they let you change the status from hired back to something else, they will count that applicant as hired and they refuse to accept any reason for changing it back. So don't make a mistake\! They will be very rude if you do\! The location of functions in the menu system is not very intuitive. Functionality is there but you have to hunt a bit and once you understand it you can find ways to make management easier. > > The tool provides interesting insights into the type of person you are hiring, which is important for understanding the most effective ways to manage and communicate with them. Unfortunately, we were having trouble determining whether the investment was really worth it and they were very rude and unhelpful. ----- ### "Excellent screening tool for candidates" — 5.0/5 > **Maciej** | *23 de outubro de 2018* | Consultoria de gestão | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Results are genuinely helpful in assessing strengths and weaknesses of potential hires. Based on the Big Five personality traits, I have a high degree of confidence in the validity of the results. The additional hurdle of completing the survey effectively filters out unqualified applicants. Customer support is excellent -- they are very open to sharing additional information and spending time with you to ensure you understand what you need to know. > > **Desvantagens**: I would like to see how employees rate on all 10 talents as opposed to just the top 5 that are used for scoring. The methodology used for scoring should be a bit more transparent so that swings in results can be explained more easily. How is each of the top 5 criteria weighted? Do the bottom 5 influence the score at all? How do you aggregate each team member's match criteria to arrive at a single score? Is it done at the talent or sub-talent, or sub-sub-talent level? It would be amazing if Plum implemented more ATS system functionality. As it stands, we still have to use a spreadsheet to manage and review candidates alongside their system. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/150347/plum?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pt/software/150347/plum) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data