--- description: Tudo sobre HackerRank: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários graças à Capterra Portugal. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: HackerRank - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Portugal 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software de Provas de Seleção](/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) > [HackerRank](/software/143549/hackerrank) # HackerRank Canonical: https://www.capterra.pt/software/143549/hackerrank Page: 1 / 5\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/143549/hackerrank?page=2) > Ele capacita os recrutadores de tecnologia a selecionar, entrevistar e contratar os melhores talentos técnicos. > > Verdict: Rated **4.5/5** by 93 users. Top-rated for **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa HackerRank? Qualquer empresa que precise contratar talentos técnicos, como engenheiros, programadores, administradores de Linux, analistas de banco de dados, desenvolvedores de dispositivos móveis e muito mais. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Classificação | Detail | | **Geral** | **4.5/5** | 93 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recursos | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: HackerRank - **Founded**: 2012 ## Commercial Context - **Preço inicial**: 199,00 US$ - **Modelo de preços**: (Teste Grátis) - **Target Audience**: 2 - 10, 11 - 50, 51 - 200, 201 - 500, 501 - 1 000, 1 001 - 5 000, 5 001 - 10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Available Countries**: Afeganistão, Alanda, Albânia, Alemanha, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antígua e Barbuda, Argentina, Argélia, Arménia, Aruba, Arábia Saudita, Austrália, Azerbaijão, Baamas, Bangladeche, Barbados, Barém, Belize and 208 more ## Recursos - Agendamento de entrevistas - Avaliação de habilidades - Biblioteca de perguntas - Biblioteca de testes predefinidos - Classificação automática - Comparação de candidatos - Criação de testes e questionários - Ferramentas de colaboração - Gestão de avaliações - Gestão de candidatos - Gestão de entrevistas - Gestão de modelos - Importação/exportação de dados - Indicadores de desempenho - Modelos - Perguntas personalizáveis - Pontuação - Relatórios e análise de dados - Seguimento dos candidatos - Testes e avaliações - Testes online - Testes para candidatos - Testes personalizáveis ## Integrations (6 total) - Avature - Greenhouse - JazzHR - Jobvite - Lever - Workable ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Suporte por telefone - Assistência 24/7 - Bate-papo ## Category - [Software de Provas de Seleção](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Software de Provas de Seleção](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) - [Software de Avaliação](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/31117/assessment/software) - [Software de Recrutamento e Seleção](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30060/applicant-tracking/software) - [Software de Recrutamento](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30602/recruiting/software) ## Alternativas 1. [ZipRecruiter](https://www.capterra.pt/software/130706/ziprecruiter) — 4.2/5 (10949 reviews) 2. [NEOGOV](https://www.capterra.pt/software/75288/neogov) — 4.5/5 (850 reviews) 3. [Indeed for Employers](https://www.capterra.pt/software/161381/indeed) — 4.5/5 (7610 reviews) 4. [Zoho Recruit](https://www.capterra.pt/software/125768/zoho-recruit) — 4.5/5 (1268 reviews) 5. [Paylocity](https://www.capterra.pt/software/86714/webpay) — 4.3/5 (1927 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Uma plataforma de testes muito útil e acessível." — 4.0/5 > **Rayan** | *19 de janeiro de 2026* | Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: O produto possui uma excelente relação custo-benefício. Possui uma biblioteca ampla ta testes e uma interface muito intuitiva. > > **Desvantagens**: O suporte ainda precisa melhorar, em muitos momentos os retornos demoram muito pra acontecer e as conversas em emails ficam confusas. Claro que isso pode ter vindo da nossa CS e não necessariamente da plataforma em si. > > Em geral eu gosto muito, é altamentamente funcional e também é uma plataforma que muitos candidatos já conhecem, o que facilita bastante. ----- ### "Great experience" — 5.0/5 > **Ana** | *8 de outubro de 2025* | Serviços e tecnologia da informação | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: What I liked most about HackerRank is its hands-on approach to learning and assessment. The platform offers a wide range of real-world coding challenges that help me improve problem-solving skills, practice different programming concepts, and benchmark my abilities against a global community of developers. > > **Desvantagens**: What I liked least about HackerRank is that some challenges can feel overly rigid, with strict input/output formats and constraints that may not fully reflect real-world coding scenarios. While this structure is useful for standardized assessment, it can sometimes limit creative problem-solving. ----- ### "A Reliable Hiring Tool with Room to Grow Beyond Coding" — 4.0/5 > **Prishi** | *14 de julho de 2026* | Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Key highlights include: Candidate activity monitoring – The platform tracks time-on-screen and captures screen size metadata, which helps reviewers assess candidate behavior and flag potential anomalies during assessments. Question library \& defaults – Adding default/pre-built questions is straightforward, making it easy to standardize assessments across roles without starting from scratch each time. Ease of setup – The overall configuration experience is intuitive, reducing the administrative overhead for hiring teams. These features collectively make HackerRank a strong choice for teams looking to run structured, auditable technical interviews at scale. > > **Desvantagens**: While HackerRank excels in many areas, there are a few friction points worth noting: Custom question creation is cumbersome – Adding custom questions is not straightforward and can be time-consuming, especially for teams that need to tailor assessments beyond the default library. The process lacks the simplicity you'd expect given how polished the rest of the platform is. Diagram-based questions are challenging for candidates – When assessments include custom diagrams or drawing-type questions, candidates often struggle with the interface. The drawing tools are not intuitive, which can introduce unnecessary friction during the test and may affect performance for reasons unrelated to the candidate's actual skill. These limitations are worth considering if your hiring process relies heavily on custom or visual problem formats — in such cases, supplementing HackerRank with a dedicated diagramming or whiteboarding tool may be necessary. > > HackerRank is a solid platform for conducting technical assessments, particularly for programming and coding-focused evaluations. The built-in question library, candidate monitoring features, and ease of standardizing assessments make it a reliable choice for most engineering hiring workflows. That said, the platform has room to grow in certain areas: Architectural \& system design questions – HackerRank is not yet optimized for architecture-style assessments. The tooling for whiteboarding, diagramming, and evaluating system design thinking feels underdeveloped compared to its strong coding evaluation capabilities. ----- ### "Outstanding Partnership and Value" — 5.0/5 > **Georgia** | *27 de fevereiro de 2026* | Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: How it enabled us to scale and to improve our processes. The platform is incredibly easy to navigate and use. It gives us a great window into how someone will perform in their interviews and shifting to live coding interviews has been game changing. > > **Desvantagens**: In the interviews the video aspect isn't great and could potentially be smoother if it ran through Google Meet instead. > > Hugely positive. The team are great and very responsive, they are as invested as we are to innovate and overcome challenges and this makes for a fantastic partnership. Working with them has allowed us to run new processes, have reliable data to back up changes and trust in what we are trying to build - together. Excellent value for money, helping us to save vast amounts whilst not faltering on quality. ----- ### "Hackerrank review" — 5.0/5 > **Rajul** | *18 de junho de 2026* | Rede de computadores | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: \* Scalable technical assessments that allow evaluation of large candidate pools efficiently. \* Objective and standardized evaluation, helping reduce bias in the screening process. \* Wide library of role-based questions across coding, SQL, AI/ML, security, and other technical domain > > **Desvantagens**: Extremely hard DSA \* Competitive programming questions \* Questions that feel unrelated to the actual role > > Overall, our experience with HackerRank has been positive. The platform has enabled us to efficiently assess technical talent at scale through standardized and objective evaluations. Its extensive question library, assessment customization options, and integrity features have helped improve the quality of candidate screening while reducing manual effort ----- Page: 1 / 5\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/143549/hackerrank?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pt/software/143549/hackerrank) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data