--- description: Tudo sobre N-central: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários graças à Capterra Portugal. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: N-central - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Portugal 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software de Gestão de Ativos de TI](/directory/30077/it-asset-management/software) > [N-central](/software/13803/n-central) # N-central Canonical: https://www.capterra.pt/software/13803/n-central Page: 1 / 11\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/13803/n-central?page=2) > A plataforma de supervisão e gestão remoto N-able® N-central® foi projetada para simplificar a gestão de redes de TI complexas. > > Verdict: Rated **4.1/5** by 243 users. Top-rated for **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa N-central? Provedores de serviços de TI e de serviços gerenciados (MSPs) em crescimento ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Classificação | Detail | | **Geral** | **4.1/5** | 243 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Suporte ao cliente | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Relação qualidade/preço | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recursos | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 70% | (7/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: N-able ## Commercial Context - **Preço inicial**: 1,75 US$ - **Modelo de preços**: (Teste Grátis) - **Target Audience**: 2 - 10, 11 - 50, 51 - 200, 201 - 500, 501 - 1 000, 1 001 - 5 000, 5 001 - 10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Windows (local), Linux (local), Android (celular), iPhone (celular), iPad (tablet) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Available Countries**: Afeganistão, Alanda, Alemanha, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antígua e Barbuda, Argentina, Argélia, Arménia, Aruba, Arábia Saudita, Austrália, Azerbaijão, Baamas, Bangladeche, Barbados, Barém, Benim, Bermudas and 177 more ## Recursos - Acesso remoto e monitoramento - Acompanhamento de atividades - Agendamento de manutenção - Alerta em tempo real - Alertas/notificações - Alerts/Escalation - Análise de rede - Análises de dados comportamentais - Backup e recuperação - Controle e acesso remoto - Controles/permissões de acesso - Descoberta automática de dispositivos - Digitalização automática - Gerenciamento BYOD - Gerenciamento da implantação - Gerenciamento de apps - Gerenciamento de configuração - Gerenciamento de correções - Gerenciamento de dispositivos - Gerenciamento de tickets de suporte - Gerente de linha de base - Gestão de Remediação - Gestão de ativos de TI - Gestão de auditorias - Gestão de capacidades - Gestão de conformidade - Gestão de edição - Gestão de estoques - Gestão de políticas - Gestão de tarefas - Gestão de toda a rede - Implantação Automática de Atualizações - Monitoramento - Monitoramento do desempenho - Monitoramento remoto e gestão - Monitoração da largura de banda - Painel - Painel de atividades - Para MSPs (Serviços gerenciados) - Portal de autoatendimento - Rastreamento de ativos de TI - Rastreamento de recursos - Real-Time Data - Real-Time Monitoring - Real-Time Notifications - Registros de eventos - Relatórios de TI - Relatórios e análise de dados - Relatórios e estatística - Scanner de vulnerabilidades ... and 18 more features ## Integrations (37 total) - 1Password - Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud - Actifile - AlertOps - Automox - Autotask PSA - Auvik - Barracuda Intronis Backup - BrightGauge - Cisco Meraki - CloudBlue - Computicate PSA - ConnectWise PSA - DNSFilter - DeskDay ... and 22 more integrations ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Suporte por telefone ## Category - [Software de Gestão de Ativos de TI](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30077/it-asset-management/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Software de Gestão de Ativos de TI](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30077/it-asset-management/software) - [Sistemas de Gerenciamento de Rede](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30018/network-management/software) - [Software de Segurança de Endpoint](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30907/endpoint-protection/software) - [Software para IT, Servidor e Monitoramento de Rede](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/32713/server-monitoring/software) - [Ferramentas de TI](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/10001/it-management/software) ## Alternativas 1. [ManageEngine OpManager MSP](https://www.capterra.pt/software/212602/manageengine-opmanager-msp) — 4.4/5 (72 reviews) 2. [N-sight RMM](https://www.capterra.pt/software/163344/n-sight) — 4.3/5 (194 reviews) 3. [IT Glue](https://www.capterra.pt/software/170401/itglue) — 4.6/5 (331 reviews) 4. [Atera](https://www.capterra.pt/software/144309/atera) — 4.5/5 (447 reviews) 5. [NinjaOne](https://www.capterra.pt/software/165889/ninjaone) — 4.7/5 (285 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Best Partner, Product is improving quickly." — 5.0/5 > **Joshua** | *6 de junho de 2025* | Segurança de rede e informática | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: It's ability to handle 3rd party patches is significant for being a default feature set. They also have built a great first pane of glass experience. > > **Desvantagens**: N-Central does not have the ability to automate against the system itself. This has required my team to work around some of the constraints instead of building exactly what they need. > > N-Able's partnership is not to be matched. They're a great partner. When they promise a feature they deliver it and they're hard at work building the most scalable traditional RMM product that will exist in the market. ----- ### "Great RMM and remote tool. MSP Manager great for our internal IT ticketing." — 4.0/5 > **brad** | *28 de abril de 2026* | Internet | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: What stands out most about N-able N-central is how it consolidates monitoring, management, and automation into a single, scalable platform. The unified dashboard gives clear visibility across endpoints, servers, and network devices without needing to jump between tools. Automation policies—especially for patching and remediation—save a significant amount of manual effort and reduce human error. Remote access is fast and reliable, which is critical for day-to-day support. > > **Desvantagens**: While N-able N-central is a strong platform overall, performance can be inconsistent at times. Certain actions—like loading dashboards, executing remote tasks, or navigating between views—can feel slower than expected, especially during peak usage. This can impact efficiency when quick responses are needed. Additionally, support responsiveness has been hit-or-miss. While the team is knowledgeable, there are instances where response times lag or follow-ups take longer than ideal, particularly during urgent situations. Improving platform speed consistency and tightening support turnaround times would make a noticeable difference in the overall experience. > > It provides a solid, centralized platform for monitoring, patch management, and remote support, which helps streamline workflows and reduce the need for multiple tools. The automation capabilities are a major advantage, allowing routine maintenance and issue remediation to run with minimal manual intervention. While there are occasional slowdowns and support response times can vary, the system itself is stable and capable at scale. For organizations managing multiple endpoints or clients, it delivers strong value and dependable performance overall. ----- ### "N-Central / N-Able Review" — 3.0/5 > **Christian** | *28 de abril de 2026* | Serviços e tecnologia da informação | Recommendation rating: 3.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The alerting system is highly reliable, ensuring that critical issues are flagged immediately without constant noise. Deployment of the agent is generally straightforward across various environments, which saves a significant amount of time during onboarding. Additionally, the patch management engine does a solid job of keeping third-party software and OS versions up to date, providing a dependable baseline for security and system stability across our managed endpoints. > > **Desvantagens**: 1. General Technical Support The support experience has become increasingly frustrating, often feeling like a hurdle rather than a resource. Response times are inconsistent, and there is a noticeable lack of deep technical expertise during initial contact, leading to prolonged downtimes for critical issues. 2. Adlumin Support Support for the Adlumin integration is particularly poor, often resulting in a "finger-pointing" loop where no one takes responsibility. It is difficult to get a straight answer or a specialist who actually understands the nuances of the integration. 3. Lack of Issue Ownership There is a glaring lack of accountability when it comes to taking ownership of open issues. Tickets frequently sit in limbo or are passed between departments without a primary point of contact ensuring the problem is actually resolved to completion. 4. Difficulty with Escalations The escalation process is opaque and incredibly slow. Even when a ticket is clearly beyond the scope of Tier 1, getting it moved to a senior engineer feels like an uphill battle, causing simple technical roadblocks to turn into multi-day ordeals. 5. Automation Policy Limitations (No PowerShell) The inability to natively use PowerShell within automation policies is a major step backward for modern IT environments. Forcing us to use a restrictive, proprietary builder instead of industry-standard scripting severely limits our ability to automate complex tasks. 6. Search Query Regressions A recent update broke the search functionality so that it no longer auto-updates the query results as you type or change parameters. This small but vital UI regression adds unnecessary clicks and friction to what should be a basic, streamlined workflow. 7. Poor Reporting Features The reporting engine is severely lacking and feels outdated. The formatting is strange and unprofessional, making it difficult to hand these documents directly to clients without extensive manual editing or external tools to make the data digestible. 8. Misplaced AI Focus The aggressive push for AI feels like a distraction from core platform stability. Instead of developing AI to solve "non-issues," the development team needs to prioritize fixing the long-standing bugs and workflow limitations that partners deal with every single day. > > The overall experience with N-able is a study in frustration between a solid, functional core and a deteriorating support and development ecosystem. On a technical level, the platform delivers on its primary promises: the alerting is dependable, and the agent deployment and patch management provide a reliable foundation for basic endpoint maintenance. When the "lights are on," the software does exactly what it needs to do to keep a fleet stable. However, the experience begins to sour as soon as you attempt to scale into advanced automation or require vendor assistance. The restriction against native PowerShell in automation policies is a massive hurdle for any modern, script-heavy MSP workflow, forcing a reliance on clunky, proprietary tools. These technical "paper cuts"—like the regressive search UI and lackluster reporting—are compounded by a support structure that seems to lack accountability and a clear escalation path, especially regarding integrations like Adlumin. Ultimately, using N-able feels like driving a reliable car where the manufacturer has stopped listening to the drivers. While the "engine" (patching and alerts) is strong, the "dashboard" (UI/Reports) is dated, and the "service center" (Support) is unresponsive. The recent pivot toward AI features feels like a missed mark; the platform would be far more valuable if the developers focused on refining existing workflows and fixing long-standing bugs rather than chasing industry buzzwords. It remains a "good enough" tool for basic needs, but it is becoming increasingly difficult to justify for high-level automation and complex support requirements. ----- ### "N-central was easy to quickly setup and deploy for our company" — 4.0/5 > **Bill** | *28 de abril de 2026* | Serviços e tecnologia da informação | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: We liked the user interface and management processes the most about deploying n-central. The user interface is very streamlined and helps greatly for navigation between clients. > > **Desvantagens**: The only downside we've had at this time is sometimes getting customer support on the phone, we'd really like it if it were a more consistent experience about who speak with on the phone when issues come up. > > Our overall experience with N-central has been very good and we'd recommend it to others companies similar to our who are looking for alternatives to Kaseya and Connectwise like we were when we started looking for a new RMM partner. ----- ### "A Solid RMM, with some oversights which hurt what could be a perfect product." — 5.0/5 > **Andrew** | *4 de maio de 2026* | Serviços e tecnologia da informação | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The customization it affords with regard to things like patching and alerting users to needed reboots, alongside the Automations provided from the community are highlights. The Automation Builder is great and easy to use, and the fact that it is based on and allows the integration of custom PowerShell scripts makes it very powerful. > > **Desvantagens**: The UI needs work and was recently made worse. Our company uses it as a cloud-only fully-probeless deployment, and even things like the home screen refuse to land us where we should be going. The new Asset view is clunky and missing lots of features, and the old Device View doesn't allow for custom or resizable columns. These are the gateways to accessing the tools and viewing, filtering, sorting, and launching tasks needs to be easy, fast, robust, and have icons for easy identification and readability. Some of these things should be obvious oversights and it feels like we are going backward with things like the recent removal of all icons. Whoever came up with that idea needs to be fired. The way patch approval rule engine needs an overhaul and simplification, as they way it is currently designed is obtuse and requires hours with support to understand what it is actually doing on the backend and what will and won't be approved and why. This is in dire need of attention. I am happy to expand on this topic on a phone call if it will improve the product, because I believe in it. PLEASE contact me. > > Love/hate. The power it affords is amazing, and in some places, the technical places, it affords a lot of possibility and is easy to use. On the other hand, fighting with the UI is tiresome, and important things like the rule engine controlling which patches are and aren't approved is obtuse and overrides and rule application order don't make logical sense. I am happy to expand on this topic on a phone call if it will improve the product, because I believe in it. PLEASE contact me. ----- Page: 1 / 11\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/13803/n-central?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pt/software/13803/n-central) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data