--- description: Tudo sobre GitHub: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários graças à Capterra Portugal. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitHub - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Portugal 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Programas para Desenvolver Aplicativos](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [GitHub](/software/129067/github) # GitHub Canonical: https://www.capterra.pt/software/129067/github Page: 1 / 248\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/129067/github?page=2) > O GitHub permite que as equipes de desenvolvimento colaborem, avaliem e gerenciem o código em um pipeline de DevOps e segurança de código integrada. > > Verdict: Rated **4.8/5** by 6165 users. Top-rated for **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa GitHub? Desenvolvimento de software para pequenas startups e grandes empresas. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Classificação | Detail | | **Geral** | **4.8/5** | 6165 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recursos | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: Microsoft - **Location**: Redmond, EUA - **Founded**: 1975 ## Commercial Context - **Preço inicial**: 4,00 US$ - **Modelo de preços**: (Free version available) (Teste Grátis) - **Target Audience**: Profissional autônomo, 2 - 10, 11 - 50, 51 - 200, 201 - 500, 501 - 1 000, 1 001 - 5 000, 5 001 - 10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Windows (local), Linux (local), Android (celular), iPhone (celular), iPad (tablet) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Available Countries**: Alemanha, Arábia Saudita, Austrália, Bielorrússia, Brasil, Bulgária, Bélgica, Canadá, China, Coreia do Sul, Croácia, Dinamarca, Egito, Espanha, Estados Unidos, Estónia, Finlândia, França, Hungria, Indonésia and 27 more ## Recursos - Ambiente de desenvolvimento integrado - Automated Testing - Compartilhamento de arquivos - Controle de marcos - Controle de qualidade - Controle de versões - Controle do progresso de tarefas - Depuração - Desenvolvimento colaborativo - Detecção de bugs/erros - Entrega contínua - Ferramentas de colaboração - Gerenciamento de configuração - Gerenciamento de repositórios - Gestão de edição - Gestão de lançamento - Gestão de pendências - Gestão de projetos - Gestão de tarefas - Gestão de tíquetes - Implantação contínua - Integração contínua - Interface gráfica do usuário - Monitoramento - Painel - Rastreamento de edição - Rastreamento de erros - Real-Time Analytics - Revisão de código - Scanner de vulnerabilidades - Seguimento de relatórios/projetos - Segurança de aplicativos ## Integrations (14 total) - CircleCI - Git - Heroku - JIRA Service Management - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Pivotal Tracker - Slack - Trello - Vercel - Visual Studio Code ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento ## Category - [Programas para Desenvolver Aplicativos](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Programas para Desenvolver Aplicativos](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [Software de Gestão de Código-Fonte](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) - [Software de Gestão de Projetos sem Fins Lucrativos](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) - [Ferramentas de Gestão de Projetos](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Software de Integração Contínua](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Jira](https://www.capterra.pt/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15345 reviews) 2. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.capterra.pt/software/101288/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3005 reviews) 3. [GitLab](https://www.capterra.pt/software/159806/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1216 reviews) 4. [Bitbucket](https://www.capterra.pt/software/157785/bitbucket) — 4.6/5 (1343 reviews) 5. [Airtable](https://www.capterra.pt/software/146652/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2227 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Great for building apps and SDK's" — 4.0/5 > **Melanie** | *14 de abril de 2025* | Software | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Able to stay up to date on development work for our App SDK's. Clients can share their feedback and report bugs directly (which we then push to Jira). > > **Desvantagens**: There is a lot of content in the repo and it can look daunting if you're not that informed and be difficult to find the information that you need to send to clients. > > Overall it's a great tool which allows for collaboration with different teams and clients and keeps everyone up to date on progress. ----- ### "The undisputed standard for code collaboration and open source" — 4.0/5 > **Davide** | *17 de abril de 2026* | Segurança e investigações | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: GitHub Actions is the CI/CD tool I prefer over any other. It is immediate, works extremely well, supports multiple operating systems, and even allows you to run self-hosted runners on-premises with minimal setup. What makes it truly powerful is the ecosystem: thousands of community-built, reusable actions exist for almost every use case, so you rarely have to reinvent the wheel. This saves an enormous amount of time day to day. Beyond Actions, the pull request workflow is excellent and the collaboration features — Issues and Discussions in particular — are extremely convenient and well-designed. GitHub is also the de facto standard for open source: almost every meaningful open source project lives here, and the fact that public repositories are free makes it the natural home for community-driven software. I use it both for my personal open source projects and at an enterprise level, and it handles both scenarios very well. The ability to host public and private repositories on the same platform without needing separate tools is a significant advantage. > > **Desvantagens**: The project management section (GitHub Projects) still feels rough compared to dedicated tools like Linear. It works, but the UX is unintuitive and I usually reach for other tools when I need real project tracking. Issues and Discussions are great; Projects needs more work. Stability has also become a concern. GitHub has been experiencing more frequent outages lately. They are usually short, but they are disruptive — when your entire workflow depends on GitHub (pushing code, running pipelines, reviewing PRs), even brief downtime brings everything to a halt. Finally, the notification system is genuinely broken for my use case. The sheer volume of notifications makes it nearly impossible to find the ones that actually matter — a comment on your own issue, a review request, a mention. I often miss important updates unless someone tells me directly or I stumble across them manually. > > GitHub is a tool I would recommend to any team, regardless of size or industry. Small teams can get started for free; larger organizations can scale up to GitHub Enterprise. The platform works equally well for closed-source commercial projects and public open source repositories, and you never need to split your work across multiple tools. I would especially recommend it to anyone building or contributing to open source software — GitHub is the central hub where projects are born, grow, and gain traction. There is simply no better place to build in public. It is also worth noting that GitHub is not limited to software developers. Writers, researchers, and academics can benefit from version-controlled plain-text workflows (Markdown, LaTeX) managed through branches and releases — and modern AI tooling makes the learning curve much more approachable than it used to be. In short: I could not work without GitHub. Despite its rough edges, it remains the most complete and widely adopted platform for code collaboration and version control available today. ----- ### "Reliable but stingy github actions capacity" — 5.0/5 > **Avaliador Verificado** | *26 de março de 2026* | Consultório médico | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: I appreciate the github actions, which allows me to run automated testing for each one of my pull requests. > > **Desvantagens**: It's annoying that I am not able to have unlimited github actions for private repos that I pay for. It's limited to a cap, which I think is a little stingy considering that I am a paying customer. I would have expected the same caps as public github repos. > > Overall, the experience is great. It's a very convenience way to store my git repos online, and I can trust that the data will be there to stay since it is owned by Microsoft. I've have my github for almost 10 years. Some years I am more active than others, but I can always count on the experience being consistent and reliable. ----- ### "Good tool for code management but lacks some features when integrating with Confluence/Jira" — 3.0/5 > **Mark** | *3 de junho de 2025* | Serviços e tecnologia da informação | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: GitHub is a great tool to manage pull requests and being able to add labels in our teams helps to differentiate between urgent items which need reviews and are vital for the next release. > > **Desvantagens**: One of the drawbacks with GitHub is integrating non development team members into a workflow process. Even though it is possible to setup a workflow too add approvers the terminology and UI is very developer based so can be a bit confusing to non development colleagues. > > Overall GItHub is a good tool for managing code, getting reviews and merging into the relevant branch ahead of deployment. There are some good integrations but it would be great if it could work more seamlessly with Confluence and Jira, and provide additional features to help automatically manage the correct states of the linked jira. ----- ### "Perfect for all sizes of projects" — 5.0/5 > **🧑‍💻 Owain** | *6 de abril de 2026* | Internet | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: I enjoy working with GitHub due to its ease of use and that so many people use it so there are tons of online resources available if you get stuck trying to set something up > > **Desvantagens**: Sometimes swapping between repos can be cumbersome. If you have multiple organisations it's not always a smooth transition between repos > > I enjoy working with GitHub so much that we've recently migrated all our bitbucket repos to GitHub. It's great that we can keep client repos private but still show our activity on our own personal accounts ----- Page: 1 / 248\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/129067/github?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pt/software/129067/github) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data