--- description: Tudo sobre GitHub: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários graças à Capterra Portugal. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitHub - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Portugal 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Programas para Desenvolver Aplicativos](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [GitHub](/software/129067/github) # GitHub Canonical: https://www.capterra.pt/software/129067/github Page: 1 / 249\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/129067/github?page=2) > O GitHub permite que as equipes de desenvolvimento colaborem, avaliem e gerenciem o código em um pipeline de DevOps e segurança de código integrada. > > Verdict: Rated **4.8/5** by 6184 users. Top-rated for **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa GitHub? Desenvolvimento de software para pequenas startups e grandes empresas. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Classificação | Detail | | **Geral** | **4.8/5** | 6184 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recursos | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: Microsoft - **Location**: Redmond, EUA - **Founded**: 1975 ## Commercial Context - **Preço inicial**: 4,00 US$ - **Modelo de preços**: (Free version available) (Teste Grátis) - **Target Audience**: Profissional autônomo, 2 - 10, 11 - 50, 51 - 200, 201 - 500, 501 - 1 000, 1 001 - 5 000, 5 001 - 10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Windows (local), Linux (local), Android (celular), iPhone (celular), iPad (tablet) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Available Countries**: Alemanha, Arábia Saudita, Austrália, Bielorrússia, Brasil, Bulgária, Bélgica, Canadá, China, Coreia do Sul, Croácia, Dinamarca, Egito, Espanha, Estados Unidos, Estónia, Finlândia, França, Hungria, Indonésia and 27 more ## Recursos - Ambiente de desenvolvimento integrado - Automated Testing - Compartilhamento de arquivos - Controle de marcos - Controle de qualidade - Controle de versões - Controle do progresso de tarefas - Depuração - Desenvolvimento colaborativo - Detecção de bugs/erros - Entrega contínua - Ferramentas de colaboração - Gerenciamento de configuração - Gerenciamento de repositórios - Gestão de edição - Gestão de lançamento - Gestão de pendências - Gestão de projetos - Gestão de tarefas - Gestão de tíquetes - Implantação contínua - Integração contínua - Interface gráfica do usuário - Monitoramento - Painel - Rastreamento de edição - Rastreamento de erros - Real-Time Analytics - Revisão de código - Scanner de vulnerabilidades - Seguimento de relatórios/projetos - Segurança de aplicativos ## Integrations (15 total) - CircleCI - Docker - Git - Heroku - JIRA Service Management - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Pivotal Tracker - Slack - Trello - Vercel - Visual Studio Code ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento ## Category - [Programas para Desenvolver Aplicativos](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Programas para Desenvolver Aplicativos](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [Software de Gestão de Código-Fonte](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) - [Software de Gestão de Projetos sem Fins Lucrativos](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) - [Ferramentas de Gestão de Projetos](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Software de Integração Contínua](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) ## Alternativas 1. [SpiraTeam](https://www.capterra.pt/software/85434/spirateam) — 4.2/5 (98 reviews) 2. [GitLab](https://www.capterra.pt/software/159806/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1222 reviews) 3. [Bitbucket](https://www.capterra.pt/software/157785/bitbucket) — 4.6/5 (1346 reviews) 4. [Jira](https://www.capterra.pt/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15404 reviews) 5. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.pt/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (3016 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Great for building apps and SDK's" — 4.0/5 > **Melanie** | *14 de abril de 2025* | Software | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Able to stay up to date on development work for our App SDK's. Clients can share their feedback and report bugs directly (which we then push to Jira). > > **Desvantagens**: There is a lot of content in the repo and it can look daunting if you're not that informed and be difficult to find the information that you need to send to clients. > > Overall it's a great tool which allows for collaboration with different teams and clients and keeps everyone up to date on progress. ----- ### "The undisputed standard for code collaboration and open source" — 4.0/5 > **Davide** | *17 de abril de 2026* | Segurança e investigações | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: GitHub Actions is the CI/CD tool I prefer over any other. It is immediate, works extremely well, supports multiple operating systems, and even allows you to run self-hosted runners on-premises with minimal setup. What makes it truly powerful is the ecosystem: thousands of community-built, reusable actions exist for almost every use case, so you rarely have to reinvent the wheel. This saves an enormous amount of time day to day. Beyond Actions, the pull request workflow is excellent and the collaboration features — Issues and Discussions in particular — are extremely convenient and well-designed. GitHub is also the de facto standard for open source: almost every meaningful open source project lives here, and the fact that public repositories are free makes it the natural home for community-driven software. I use it both for my personal open source projects and at an enterprise level, and it handles both scenarios very well. The ability to host public and private repositories on the same platform without needing separate tools is a significant advantage. > > **Desvantagens**: The project management section (GitHub Projects) still feels rough compared to dedicated tools like Linear. It works, but the UX is unintuitive and I usually reach for other tools when I need real project tracking. Issues and Discussions are great; Projects needs more work. Stability has also become a concern. GitHub has been experiencing more frequent outages lately. They are usually short, but they are disruptive — when your entire workflow depends on GitHub (pushing code, running pipelines, reviewing PRs), even brief downtime brings everything to a halt. Finally, the notification system is genuinely broken for my use case. The sheer volume of notifications makes it nearly impossible to find the ones that actually matter — a comment on your own issue, a review request, a mention. I often miss important updates unless someone tells me directly or I stumble across them manually. > > GitHub is a tool I would recommend to any team, regardless of size or industry. Small teams can get started for free; larger organizations can scale up to GitHub Enterprise. The platform works equally well for closed-source commercial projects and public open source repositories, and you never need to split your work across multiple tools. I would especially recommend it to anyone building or contributing to open source software — GitHub is the central hub where projects are born, grow, and gain traction. There is simply no better place to build in public. It is also worth noting that GitHub is not limited to software developers. Writers, researchers, and academics can benefit from version-controlled plain-text workflows (Markdown, LaTeX) managed through branches and releases — and modern AI tooling makes the learning curve much more approachable than it used to be. In short: I could not work without GitHub. Despite its rough edges, it remains the most complete and widely adopted platform for code collaboration and version control available today. ----- ### "Reliable Platform for Version Control and Test Automation Collaboration" — 5.0/5 > **Sarav** | *20 de maio de 2026* | Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: GitHub made collaboration and version control very efficient for development and automation testing projects. I especially liked the seamless integration with VS Code, which made committing, reviewing, and managing code much easier directly from the editor. Using GitHub together with Playwright helped streamline test automation workflows, maintain test scripts, and collaborate effectively with team members through PRs and branch management. > > **Desvantagens**: Managing merge conflicts and repository permissions sometimes required extra attention. Some advanced enterprise features and CI/CD capabilities may also become expensive for smaller teams. > > Overall, my experience with GitHub has been very positive. It has been a reliable platform for source code management, collaboration, and automation testing workflows. The integration with VS Code improved developer productivity, and using Playwright with GitHub helped organize and maintain automated test scripts efficiently. Features like pull requests, issue tracking, and GitHub Actions added value to the development lifecycle and team collaboration. ----- ### "Good tool for code management but lacks some features when integrating with Confluence/Jira" — 3.0/5 > **Mark** | *3 de junho de 2025* | Serviços e tecnologia da informação | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: GitHub is a great tool to manage pull requests and being able to add labels in our teams helps to differentiate between urgent items which need reviews and are vital for the next release. > > **Desvantagens**: One of the drawbacks with GitHub is integrating non development team members into a workflow process. Even though it is possible to setup a workflow too add approvers the terminology and UI is very developer based so can be a bit confusing to non development colleagues. > > Overall GItHub is a good tool for managing code, getting reviews and merging into the relevant branch ahead of deployment. There are some good integrations but it would be great if it could work more seamlessly with Confluence and Jira, and provide additional features to help automatically manage the correct states of the linked jira. ----- ### "The Version Control Packed With Features" — 4.0/5 > **Avaliador Verificado** | *27 de maio de 2026* | Bens de consumo | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: This version control makes coding, deployment and maintainance of repository easier for a team.The tool is also exceptional for automating workflows. Easy to integrate with other UI platforms such as source tree , making it user friendly. > > **Desvantagens**: Permission and security management with access tokens can be complicated. For large enterprices, Github can be expensive. For a new user, advance features have a steap learning curve. > > overall, I have a positive experience with the platform. Github is a widely used version control platform helping team collaboration and clean coding. over the years, it has created a strong ecosystem of its own. The large online community makes the life of a user easier. ----- Page: 1 / 249\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/129067/github?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pt/software/129067/github) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data