--- description: Tudo sobre eCivis: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários graças à Capterra Portugal. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: eCivis - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Portugal 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software de Gestão de Subvenções](/directory/30567/grant-management/software) > [eCivis](/software/122493/grants-network) # eCivis Canonical: https://www.capterra.pt/software/122493/grants-network Page: 1 / 7\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/122493/grants-network?page=2) > O eCivis é um dos principais sistemas de gestão de verbas do tipo SaaS (software como serviço) do país para governos estaduais e locais e tribos. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 152 users. Top-rated for **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa eCivis? O eCivis é um software de gestão de verbas para governos estaduais, locais, tribais e parceiros comunitários. Também pode ser usado por faculdades comunitárias e distritos escolares. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Classificação | Detail | | **Geral** | **4.4/5** | 152 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recursos | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: eCivis - **Founded**: 2000 ## Commercial Context - **Preço inicial**: 5200,00 US$ - **Target Audience**: 2 - 10, 11 - 50, 51 - 200, 201 - 500, 501 - 1 000, 1 001 - 5 000, 5 001 - 10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Chromebook (desktop) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Available Countries**: Estados Unidos ## Recursos - Descoberta de subsídios - Ferramentas de colaboração - Geração de relatórios financeiros - Gestão de contratos e licenças - Gestão de formulários - Lembretes - Rastreamento de pagamentos - Relatórios e estatística - Revisão de documentos ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Suporte por telefone - Bate-papo ## Category - [Software de Gestão de Subvenções](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30567/grant-management/software) ## Alternativas 1. [DonorPerfect](https://www.capterra.pt/software/2698/donorperfect-fundraising-software) — 4.5/5 (1384 reviews) 2. [Bloomerang](https://www.capterra.pt/software/131207/bloomerang) — 4.7/5 (1287 reviews) 3. [Donorbox](https://www.capterra.pt/software/156860/donorbox) — 4.8/5 (624 reviews) 4. [Little Green Light](https://www.capterra.pt/software/123954/little-green-light) — 4.8/5 (316 reviews) 5. [MonkeyPod](https://www.capterra.pt/software/203848/monkeypod) — 4.8/5 (100 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Customer service is great--Anthony Torres is amazing." — 4.0/5 > **Bashar** | *6 de abril de 2018* | Administração pública | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: It's ease of use--very straightforward. I like the tasks and workflow features--they are very useful internally and make eliminate all the paper between departments. Tracking it and the time it's in a department is great too. > > **Desvantagens**: Scheduling reports takes too long. I think "simple tasks" should actually be simple. The scheduled report feature should be easier and all report should be camped under one or two folders in the eCivis documents section. There's no point is seeing a thousand different folders for various reports, as long as dates of reports are maintained. For example, we only need 1 folder for Progress Reports and 1 folder for FFRs. > > Stay organized and on track with inter departmental tasks. Keeps documents in one place and easy to find. ----- ### "Grant Writers Resource" — 5.0/5 > **Linda Burke** | *18 de abril de 2019* | Gestão de organizações sem fins lucrativos | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: eCIVIS allows me to search for grants that are beyond the usual local foundations with which we partner. We actually have found a few new grantors, who share our commitment to persons living with Down syndrome and were willing to give us a grant. The format provides easy access to information about specific grant opportunities. Within just a few minutes, it is possible to determine if our organization is eligible to apply for a grant. The inclusion of grant guidelines tells me if this is an opportunity we should pursue. The selection of grants presented gives me a good idea of the trends among grantmakers. Using eCIVIS is always a positive experience. > > **Desvantagens**: The only negative is that eCIVIS lists just a few grant opportunities relevant to our organization. Just kidding, of course. What grant writer wouldn't like a huge list of grant possibilities specific to their cause? > > In my opinion, eCIVIS , rather than solving business problems, presents our non-profit with opportunities to find additional funds to continue to provide high quality services which help individuals with Down syndrome become as independent as possible. ----- ### "Grants Network" — 3.0/5 > **Eric** | *13 de novembro de 2014* > > Overall a good deal of customization would be required to add significant value to the process wherein grants are currently being centrally tracked. Still, eCivis adds a friendly windows format and a means for different departments to access their grants. The "Grant" and "Project" concepts theoretically mirror the County's, but there seem to be a number of mis-matches, i.e., fields that might belong in Projects are in Grants, and vice-versa. Certain fields that exist, such as defining the total amount available, do not seem to be as relevant, as other potentially useful fields which are not captured at all (e.g. Commissioners Court dates, FTEs, ability to track award budgets at the object level, among others) The grant library does not seem to be updated with many of the grants that the County applies for, and the process of adding them to the Library is time-consuming and eCivis seems to rely on the County to document this. Search fields are not matched well to the County's specific needs: for example, there are two fields for Health -- Prevention, and Research. The County's need is mostly Public Health, and there is no field for that. Further, it would be helpful to have sub-fields within broad categories such as Public Health (Epidemiology, Family Planning, HIV-AIDS, WIC, etc). eCivis features a tool to send emails periodically on new grant opportunities, not unlike tools already in use such as grants.gov. The tool allows for some customization, but many of the hits that come back are extraneous. Still, this has been the most popular feature of eCivis to date. I've kept this fairly short, but where many of the features could be critiqued, the overall comment is that eCivis is not a bad system, and could be a good system for less complicated jurisdictions. Short of that, a good deal of customization would need to be added, or the grant tracking module significantly revamped to address more than basic needs. ----- ### "I use it everyday multiple times for different reasons." — 4.0/5 > **Avaliador Verificado** | *5 de abril de 2018* | Educação superior | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The different features of grants management. I like having that in the same place as I do my grant searches. Also, I like the ability to email solicitations directly to staff and mail groups. > > **Desvantagens**: None at this time. I have never had an issue with it and use it every day. None of the other users in the district have mentioned any issues with it either. ----- ### "Comprehensive, user-friendly government and national agency grant-seeking software." — 4.0/5 > **Avaliador Verificado** | *5 de abril de 2018* > > **Vantagens**: Very comprehensive for government and national-level grant opportunities. Very easy to use and quick to learn. Great resource for continued learning, with webinars, manuals, documents, and more\! > > **Desvantagens**: Strong focus on government and national opportunities, without many local/regional options. Layout/platform can feel a bit institutional/mundane. More colors would be nice\! ----- Page: 1 / 7\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/122493/grants-network?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pt/software/122493/grants-network) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data