Cherwell Service Management
Conheça o Cherwell Service Management
O Cherwell Asset Management foi desenvolvido para organizações que buscam grandes reduções nos gastos com licenças de software, despesas gerais de TI e risco de auditoria de software. Ao integrar todos os dados relacionados ao estoque de hardware e software, uso de aplicativo, direitos de licença e compras de TI, é possível acompanhar e gerenciar os investimentos em TI, desde a compra até o descarte, e abandonar as planilhas do Excel.
Quem usa o Cherwell Service Management?
Profissionais de central de serviços que exigem um sistema totalmente integrado, facilmente personalizado, automatizando a biblioteca de infraestrutura de tecnologia da informação (ITIL, na sigla em inglês) e os fluxos de trabalho personalizados. Perfeito para empresas que oferecem suporte a mais de 1.000 usuários finais.
Not sure about Cherwell Service Management? Compare with a popular alternative
Cherwell Service Management
Outras ótimas alternativas ao Cherwell Service Management
Avaliações do Cherwell Service Management
Douglas
Very effective ticketing system
Comentários: Cherwell Service Management has been a very effective ticketing system for our operation. It rewards inquisitive users who have some experience with SQL queries. It integrates with our email system, so we end up receiving and answering email inquiries from our user community through the Cherwell interface. It gives good reporting, and good statistics, although the reporting requires some effort to access. It has been a good system for my organization
Vantagens:
Customization of searches; use of an SQ-like search format to build queries that can then be saved and reused
Desvantagens:
Requires some level of training in order to increase personal customization. Occasionally have multiple people working on the same tickets, so some tickets get resolved with ineffective solutions while others are working on them. Reporting requires some effort to access.
Avaliador Verificado
Alternativas consideradas:
Great product with high upside
Comentários: Overall the process with Cherwell has been great. The product is fantastic with very few hiccups.
Vantagens:
This product allows us to customize it in a way that makes it so we can bring all departments within the same system (finally!).
Desvantagens:
Implementation and additional integrations can be difficult (as with any product).
Avaliador Verificado
Standard functionality but horrible UX
Comentários:
We use Cherwell as a ticketing system for the help desk as well as change management system. The user interface is challenging, to say the least. There are frames within frames that have to be scrolled through separately to see all of the information. The text box containing the user's message is so small, it show the tiniest portion of the message. To expand it, you have to pop open a new window, which automatically inactivates the main window so you have to trick the system in order to see multiple tickets at once.
The emailing functionality is clunky - the initial email you send to a customer uses one link but replies after that need to use a different "email" button that is oddly hard to find. When a customer sends a reply, the ticket displays in a different color, but that is the only notification. So if they send multiple messages, you wouldn't know unless you fully open the ticket and that is cumbersome.
There's an inactivity timeout that may not apply to everyone, but it's a hassle. The system times out after an hour of inactivity but it isn't consistent - sometimes it will run for days with no activity and not sign me out and other times it's at 60 minutes on the dot. Also sometimes when I'm logged out automatically, it doesn't actually log me out so when I try to log back in, I'm locked out.
Overall, with the current UX, it would have to be the cheapest option available for me to recommend it to anyone.
Vantagens:
Help desk tickets are tracked Released changes are tracked
Desvantagens:
User experience Look and feel of the software Search functionality Notification process Inactivity timeout
André
A good and reliable ticket management system
Comentários: Good experience, the ticket management, the SLA tools, the filter tools, the access control and the idea of cloud based solution are very good differentials compared to the other solutions on the market, also it is reliable, on these 3 years using the solution, I could not remember any interruptions. Last but not least, the possibility to customize the solution, going through the development directly on the code is awesome, if the company has a programmer or a devolopment team, it can be totally customized for the company.
Vantagens:
It is reliable to manage your tickets, the SLAs, the escalation plans, everything works perfectly right. Therefore, the option to use the asset management is pretty interesting as well and you can access it from anywhere without you have an infrastructure, it is totally on cloud. Another plus about the software, is the possibility to customize it, according to your company, if you have an development team.
Desvantagens:
Some features, like the agent to inventory the assets, needs to be bought apart from the software, it is something that would be really useful if it came together with the bundle.
Maizy
Enterprise-Level Ticketing System
Comentários: I really like Cherwell, and find it does meet our needs well for ticketing. I'm able to enter my information quickly to submit and process tickets. Great tool.
Vantagens:
Cherwell is a well established IT ticketing tool, that my company has used for over two years now. We use it for incident reporting and journaling, as well as for our operation changes. I really like the robustness of it. It's user friendly, and has options and controls for almost anything I'd want to enter for the tickets. The software is customizable, and our admin team has tweaked things to be more in line with our company and uses. It has a clean smooth interface and does handle everything we want to do with our tickets.
Desvantagens:
When we first switched to Cherwell from HPSM, we did find the learning curve to be large, as the two tools have many differences. In general, like with any software, it does take time to get used to, but once we did get used to it, it seems rather smooth.
