--- description: Tudo sobre Assembly Voting: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários graças à Capterra Portugal. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Assembly Voting - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Portugal 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Sistemas de Votação](/directory/31217/voting/software) > [Assembly Voting](/software/1019257/assembly-voting-x) # Assembly Voting Canonical: https://www.capterra.pt/software/1019257/assembly-voting-x Page: 1 / 2\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/1019257/assembly-voting-x?page=2) > Software acessível que comprova a integridade dos processos democráticos e verifica a precisão dos resultados da votação. > > Verdict: Rated **4.8/5** by 10 users. Top-rated for **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa Assembly Voting? Mais adequado para organizações não governamentais (ONG), associações profissionais, empresas privadas, sindicatos, partidos políticos e outros tipos de organizações que desejam realizar eleições e assembleias online com segurança. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Classificação | Detail | | **Geral** | **4.8/5** | 10 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recursos | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: Assembly Voting ## Commercial Context - **Modelo de preços**: (Teste Grátis) - **Target Audience**: 51 - 200, 201 - 500, 501 - 1 000, 1 001 - 5 000, 5 001 - 10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web - **Idiomas**: alemão, dinamarquês, espanhol, finlandês, francês, inglês, islandês, russo, sueco, árabe - **Available Countries**: Afeganistão, Alanda, Albânia, Alemanha, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antígua e Barbuda, Argentina, Argélia, Arménia, Aruba, Arábia Saudita, Austrália, Azerbaijão, Baamas, Bangladeche, Barbados, Barém, Belize and 208 more ## Recursos - Acompanhamento de participação - Autenticação de eleitores - Controle de eleições - Cédulas de votação impressas - Enquetes/votações - Gestão de cédulas - Gestão de eleitores - Indicações - Perfis de candidatos - Relatórios e estatística - Votação com ordem de preferência - Votação online - Votação ponderada ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Suporte por telefone ## Category - [Sistemas de Votação](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/31217/voting/software) ## Alternativas 1. [NemoVote](https://www.capterra.pt/software/203575/nemovote) — 4.8/5 (68 reviews) 2. [AssociationVoting](https://www.capterra.pt/software/172696/associationvoting) — 4.7/5 (173 reviews) 3. [eBallot](https://www.capterra.pt/software/172194/eballot) — 4.1/5 (19 reviews) 4. [Sequent](https://www.capterra.pt/software/1033663/sequent) — 5.0/5 (2 reviews) 5. [Echo360](https://www.capterra.pt/software/172761/turningpoint) — 4.2/5 (44 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Assembly Voting makes voting easy" — 5.0/5 > **Thomas Plett** | *1 de maio de 2023* | Petróleo e energia | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The system is so easy to use for the end users. > > **Desvantagens**: - ----- ### "PostNord Strålfors and Assembly Voting - millions of voters served together" — 4.0/5 > **Marko** | *3 de março de 2023* | Serviços e tecnologia da informação | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: We have jointly with AV been using their voting systems Votes, AVX and Candidacy since 2015. Election sizes have varied between 250 voters to 1.4 million voters and still the systems have worked without glitches. Basic configuration work is equally easy for all sizes and support for more complex solutions is always available if need occurs. > > **Desvantagens**: The outlook of all web browser based services is critical when users are wanted to visit the web pages. In candidate search and voting the static pages are no more the best solution, as users are used to dynamic and live content everywhere in web. Also the language of services should cover both user experience but also customers administrative users experience. > > Basic products are easy to use for standard election customers. But jointly we have created super customer experiences for most demanding banking sector election customers. Assembly Voting willingness to develop service and and capability to generate ideas are the most important values when one size does not fit all. ----- ### "Online voting tool" — 4.0/5 > **Jehovanisi** | *21 de setembro de 2022* | Transporte rodoviário e ferroviário | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: That allow key users to reach the voting process in a confidential environment Secret ballot is important in some cases > > **Desvantagens**: it's complicated to operate. It need some training to understand the logic of the tool > > Good experience and keep evolving. They have listen to our needs. ----- ### "Assembly Voting election software review" — 5.0/5 > **Andy** | *17 de janeiro de 2023* | Serviços jurídicos | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: An excellent fit for our requirements, with a modern voter interface making it engaging for voters to use and cast votes. > > **Desvantagens**: Nothing really, as it's a professional solution designed for purpose > > Assembly Voting provide us with a level of service we would expect from a voting systems provider. They have always provided us with the information needed to deliver the voting processes that we udnertake. ----- ### "General Meeting elections using Assembly Voting was 5\*" — 5.0/5 > **Karla** | *24 de janeiro de 2023* | Internet | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Features such as the opening and closing keys ceremonies and encryption provided more security and peace of mind, as did the two code log in for members. ease of use of the UI was also a bonus in both testing the system and for members. > > **Desvantagens**: Vote verification process is clunky and we had to write out step by step instructions for members to verify their vote, most then didn't do it since it meant they would have to vote all over again (I understand this from a security point of view though). > > The customer service from Assembly Voting is second to none, I can't fault it. AV were very easy to work with and if you do come across any stumbling blocks, they fix the issues very quickly. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/1019257/assembly-voting-x?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pt/software/1019257/assembly-voting-x) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data