--- description: Tudo sobre Ranorex Studio: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários graças à Capterra Portugal. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Ranorex Studio - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Portugal 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Ferramentas de Gerenciamento de Testes](/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) > [Ranorex Studio](/software/173144/ranorex-studio) # Ranorex Studio Canonical: https://www.capterra.pt/software/173144/ranorex-studio Page: 1 / 6\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/173144/ranorex-studio?page=2) > O Ranorex Studio é o conjunto de ferramentas completo para acelerar os testes de ponta a ponta em aplicativos de área de trabalho, internet e móvel. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 123 users. Top-rated for **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa Ranorex Studio? Os clientes do Ranorex incluem testadores individuais, consultores, engenheiros de automação de testes, gerentes de garantia de qualidade e desenvolvedores em organizações de todos os tamanhos. O que eles têm em comum é a paixão pelo software de qualidade. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Classificação | Detail | | **Geral** | **4.4/5** | 123 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recursos | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: IDERA - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Preço inicial**: 4650,00 US$ - **Modelo de preços**: (Teste Grátis) - **Target Audience**: Profissional autônomo, 2 - 10, 11 - 50, 51 - 200, 201 - 500, 501 - 1 000, 1 001 - 5 000, 5 001 - 10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Windows (desktop), Windows (local), Android (celular), iPhone (celular), iPad (tablet) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Available Countries**: Afeganistão, Alanda, Albânia, Alemanha, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antígua e Barbuda, Argentina, Argélia, Arménia, Aruba, Arábia Saudita, Austrália, Azerbaijão, Baamas, Bangladeche, Barbados, Barém, Belize and 209 more ## Recursos - Avaliações de roteiros de teste - Controle de qualidade - Ferramentas de colaboração - Gerenciamento de testes de software - Gestão do fluxo de trabalho - Suporte para execução paralela - Teste de performance - Visualização de dados - Visualização hierárquica ## Integrations (12 total) - Bamboo - BrowserStack - Bugzilla - ConnectALL Integration Platform - Jenkins - Jira - Sauce Labs - Selenium IDE - SpiraTeam - TeamCity - TestBench - TestRail ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum ## Category - [Ferramentas de Gerenciamento de Testes](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Ferramentas de Gerenciamento de Testes](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) - [Ferramentas para Testes Automatizados](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Programas para Teste de Desempenho](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/31124/performance-testing/software) - [Software de Testes de Carga](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/32135/load-testing/software) ## Alternativas 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.capterra.pt/software/162900/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (749 reviews) 2. [TestMu AI](https://www.capterra.pt/software/170732/lambdatest) — 4.6/5 (543 reviews) 3. [Katalon Studio](https://www.capterra.pt/software/1018018/katalon-studio) — 4.4/5 (706 reviews) 4. [SoapUI](https://www.capterra.pt/software/170648/soapui) — 4.5/5 (168 reviews) 5. [Cypress](https://www.capterra.pt/software/168276/cypress) — 4.7/5 (67 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Ranorex: Easy and Powerful Software Automation Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Deepakkumar N.** | *14 de fevereiro de 2019* | Transporte rodoviário e ferroviário | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: \[My Organization got 20+ licenses for Ranorex after trying it out for 30+ days for free - I am neither related to Ranorex nor is this a paid review\] Pros: 1. The tool is comparatively easy to learn \[Compared to QTP-UFT\]. 2. There is amazing support available from Ranorex - This was possible because of the 20+ licenses purchased and Ranorex Representatives coming in to solve our specific queries. 3. The tool is powerful in the sense that it can help recognize and work with / take care of blinking objects / tooltips which disappear quickly / dynamic object which are difficult to recognize from automation perspective. 4. I like the idea that the tool gives you the power to start easy \[simple recordings\] and then you can take charge \[for more complicated stuff - to harden the solutions\] by designing User Code Methods / Modules. > > **Desvantagens**: 1. The tool is not cheap. \[But worth the money spent\] 2. Every-time you need to execute your code / automation recording, the whole solution needs to be re-built which takes time and is annoying. 3. Using the GitHub tool along with Ranorex for maintaining the code from various developers / maintaining versions and releases can be tricky and needs a little practice and patience. > > Our organization works on a legacy desktop project using some relatively old Java Elements for its front-end design combined with C++ backend using CORBA calls. Some of the GUI objects are relatively new. So our project has a mix of legacy / old Java objects \[swanky toolbars\] / new Java objects and c++ for backend. Overall, the learning curve for the Ranorex Automation Tool was not steep. I genuinely enjoy the coding and designing part for the project using this powerful tool as a senior architect for the project. My Genuine Advice: Before purchasing, please use the free version of the tool and try building up an object repository for the system under test which can give you the confidence whether this tool is right for your project or not. ----- ### "The best tool for mobile testing automation" — 4.0/5 > **Katarzyna** | *4 de outubro de 2019* | Fotografia | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Complexity. The tool is proffesional (we have been used free Katalon Studio earlier which was buggy). It is very useful for mobile testing automation for our Android nad iOS apps. Tests are stable and easy to maintain. > > **Desvantagens**: Unfortunately - the costs. This tools isn't cheap. Also, Ranorex because of its complexity, it is not easy to at the first glance. You need some training and time to learn how to prepare tests. > > As I described above - Ranorex is highly useful for creating and executing stable mobile tests on our devices (Android, iOS). In future we plan to use this tool for web automation, too. ----- ### "Months without a solution ..." — 1.0/5 > **Avaliador Verificado** | *18 de novembro de 2021* | Software | Recommendation rating: 0.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Although the first year with Ranorex was fine and increased our productivity overall, the first problem that appeared after the standard support period expired gave the whole cooperation a bad taste. > > **Desvantagens**: Apart from the fact that if you don't buy support continuously and the problem appears after a year and a half, for example, you have to buy support for the whole past period just to get someone to talk to you, after buying support and reporting the problem it took them half a year to even get to the problem analysis during which we were without a working application. Several times we had to tediously report the same problem over and over again as we were shuffled around by support teams who had no continuity for our support case. > > When our support expired again for a period during which we could not use the program, Ranorex referred us to another support purchase, still without a working solution. This is totally unacceptable and definitely not a pro-customer approach. ----- ### "Fred's input of Ranorex" — 5.0/5 > **Fred** | *17 de junho de 2025* | Petróleo e energia | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The spy and tracking features are great When a script fails having a green check mark to show what is working in playback mode vs a red "x" next to what fails in the xPath just speeds up the debugging process > > **Desvantagens**: Moving a project to another machine and merging two projects. Honestly, I have not done this enough to feel 100 % comfortable with it. I hope to get more time to do this in my present job > > I first started using Ranorex in 2015 at Kapsch TrafficCom. In 2021 I brough Ranorex to INPO. I have used IBM Witt, WinRunner, Xrunner, Rational Robot, QTP and UAT and by far I love using Ranorex the most. I cannot wait to see what Ranorex will do with AI in the coming years ----- ### "Ranorex rocks\!" — 4.0/5 > **Pavel** | *14 de novembro de 2018* | Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: What I really like about Ranorex is its wide coverage of technologies, relative easy to learn and use UI, pretty robust and reliable element recognition and very helpful and responsive support. In fact, their proactive and friendly support was one of the major decision points for me. I'm working with Ranorex since 2012 and so far, I was always able to achieve my goals (automating mainly desktop and web-based apps). > > **Desvantagens**: Unfortunately, I really don't like Ranorex API documentation. While the general Ranorex user guide is great both for novice and advanced users, advanced coders may find Ranorex API documentation pretty inadequate and lacking samples. Luckily, Ranorex user forum is already filled with tons of use cases and code examples. Still, Ranorex API documentation really needs an overhaul. ----- Page: 1 / 6\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/173144/ranorex-studio?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pt/software/173144/ranorex-studio) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data