--- description: Tudo sobre Fusion Framework System: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários graças à Capterra Portugal. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Fusion Framework System - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Portugal 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Sistemas de Gestão de Riscos](/directory/30665/risk-management/software) > [Fusion Framework System](/software/150583/fusion) # Fusion Framework System Canonical: https://www.capterra.pt/software/150583/fusion Page: 1 / 3\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/150583/fusion?page=2) > Descubra como o Fusion pode redefinir os programas de continuidade das operações e gestão de riscos. > > Verdict: Rated **4.5/5** by 51 users. Top-rated for **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa Fusion Framework System? Organizações que desejam obter flexibilidade operacional. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Classificação | Detail | | **Geral** | **4.5/5** | 51 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recursos | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: Fusion Risk Management - **Location**: Rolling Meadows, EUA - **Founded**: 2006 ## Commercial Context - **Modelo de preços**: (Teste Grátis) - **Target Audience**: 51 - 200, 201 - 500, 501 - 1 000, 1 001 - 5 000, 5 001 - 10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Chromebook (desktop), Android (celular), iPhone (celular), iPad (tablet) - **Idiomas**: alemão, chinês, chinês tradicional, coreano, dinamarquês, espanhol, francês, inglês, irlandês, italiano, japonês, neerlandês, norueguês, português, russo, sueco, tailandês, árabe - **Available Countries**: Alemanha, Brasil, Bélgica, Canadá, China, Dinamarca, Estados Unidos, França, Irlanda, Japão, Luxemburgo, México, Noruega, Países Baixos, Reino Unido, Suécia, Suíça, Áustria ## Recursos - Acesso para Celular - Alertas de riscos - Alertas/notificações - Armazenamento de dados seguros - Avaliação de riscos - Controle do processo de aprovação - Controles/permissões de acesso - Fluxo de trabalho configurável - Geração de relatórios de incidentes - Gerenciamento de documentos - Gerenciamento de fornecedores - Gestão de Comunicações - Gestão de auditorias - Gestão de avaliações - Gestão de conformidade - Gestão de contratos e licenças - Gestão de controles internos - Gestão de incidentes - Gestão de projetos - Gestão de respostas - Gestão de riscos de TI - Gestão de riscos operacionais - Gestão de tarefas - Gestão do fluxo de trabalho - Gestão do risco - Incorporação - Indicadores de desempenho - Offboarding - Painel - Pontuação de risco - Portal de autoatendimento - Real-Time Reporting - Recuperação de desastres - Registro de auditoria - Risk Analysis - Seguimento de status - Sistema de investigação - Visualização de dados ## Integrations (11 total) - AlertMedia - Argos Risk - Boomi - Everbridge Mass Notification - MuleSoft Anypoint Platform - OnSolve Platform - Salesforce Sales Cloud - SecurityScorecard - ServiceNow - Supply Wisdom - xMatters ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Suporte por telefone - Bate-papo ## Category - [Sistemas de Gestão de Riscos](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30665/risk-management/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Sistemas de Gestão de Riscos](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30665/risk-management/software) - [Software de Gestão de Riscos Empresariais (ERM)](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/32559/erm/software) - [Software de Continuidade de Negócio](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/30206/business-continuity/software) - [Sistemas de Gestão de Fornecedores](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/10024/vendor-management/software) - [Sistemas de Gestão Integrada de Riscos](https://www.capterra.pt/directory/31545/integrated-risk-management/software) ## Alternativas 1. [MasterControl Quality Excellence](https://www.capterra.pt/software/148577/mastercontrol) — 4.5/5 (526 reviews) 2. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.pt/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2887 reviews) 3. [GOAT Risk](https://www.capterra.pt/software/205001/goat-risk) — 4.7/5 (65 reviews) 4. [D\&B Finance Analytics](https://www.capterra.pt/software/202723/d-b-finance-analytics) — 4.5/5 (137 reviews) 5. [AuditBoard](https://www.capterra.pt/software/148230/soxhub) — 4.7/5 (414 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Strong Business Continuity and Resilience Platform" — 5.0/5 > **Greg** | *22 de maio de 2024* | Alimentação e bebidas | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The Fusion platform has helped us build our continuity plans, categorize our risks, and incidents across our organization. Fusion is very easy to use, update, and everything connects together easily. The platform is very reliable and stable. In addition, Fusion has been thoughtful with integrations, such as with AlertMedia and Security Scorecard, which allows you to bring in additional data for context and awareness. > > **Desvantagens**: Because the platform is built on Salesforce, which is pretty easy to use, you're limited to what Salesforce can (or cannot) do - such as enhancements or specific customizations. Also, with Salesforce, additional seat licenses can be expensive. > > We have been partners with Fusion since 2017 and have used the product quite extensively. They are a passionate organization that wants to see their clients be successful and resilient. They have been great to work with. ----- ### "Fusion Framework System, by Ed Brown" — 5.0/5 > **Ed** | *31 de janeiro de 2020* | Seguros | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: I love the simplicity as an administrator to make changes, within my knowledge limits and the use of Fuel Hours to supplement my knowledge gaps. There were very view, but some, implementation problems. Fusion listens to their clients and has since improved their implementation process. I presented a complex model to determine the process RTO based 9 impact categories over time. They delivered what I wanted. Of course, I think, everyone client would want this model and it should be a separate object because it did eat up a lot of our available custom fields in the process object. We are working with Fusion to pull that part out and create a new object or leverage a lesser used object. I really like the incident management object. > > **Desvantagens**: I think there should have been standard dashboarding out of the box. All clients implement a program with a BCP life cycle and dashboard are used to help user and program managers manage compliance to the annual deliverables. Instead these were created with fuel hours. (scale 1-10, 1 being not a big deal to 10 being horrible - this is a 2.) I am also accustom to having a BIA (Process) review with a maintenance control and we used fuel hours to enhance this for a BIA approval section. I think that should be standard. (scale 1-10, 1 being not a big deal to 10 being horrible - this is a 4.) Lastly plan conga generator and its templates are not well designed and we have had several changes requested to make them design the way we want them. Fusion could spend more time on the conga templates clients may like. (scale 1-10, 1 being not a big deal to 10 being horrible - this is a 7.) All these cons are correctable and have been and which is why I added the first PRO above. > > Improved crisis management and communication during events. We call these response plans which are activated based on the level of the event and are a prelude to a recovery plan activation. ----- ### "Expensive product with lots of hidden caveats." — 3.0/5 > **Kevin** | *16 de outubro de 2022* | Bancos | Recommendation rating: 2.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: It is not vaporware and does cover a wide area on a number of BC, DR, QA, EM, Risk, etc areas. > > **Desvantagens**: Limited by Salesforce platform and decisions. Can't run large reports. Have to export to run deep analytics. No real tools to measure performance of system or determine what the issues are. No Archiving built in. Audits require evidence within a audit window period "typically" in the past. Reporting ability with Conga is outdated. Even the new Adv Reporting should be called Adv Dashboarding. Executives DO NOT want to login to see those pretty pictures. Need a supported interface to PowerBI. SOQL is NOT SQL. Joins limited to 3 levels. Every SQL tool I have used to solve problems in the past is basically NOT allowed in SOQL. Lacking Audit tools to even use Shield product. Lack of advanced training specific for the tool. Need a 3rd party blog site to track and discuss issues that will NEVER be discussed or even allowed in the ENGAGE meetings. Limitations on refreshes, limitation on space for data, and the absolute need to engage with additional 3rd parties and tools for Deployments and backup and recovery. It is embarrassing that a Risk (BC/DR) tool does not even have "self coverage" of BC/DR within an RTO/RPO or MTO that would pass an audit much less a real event. > > If you go with base package, then load your data and go from there, you will have a better chance of success. Like all software packages, the Devil is in the details. If you want a bespoke solution then do not buy a package that limits your ability to customize it to the UI or the limitations of ANOTHER 3rd party (Salesforce) which is an independent company that creates issues on "who" to even talk to. ----- ### "Fabulous Fusion Framework" — 5.0/5 > **Vicky** | *3 de fevereiro de 2020* | Telecomunicações | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: That it is so flexible and configurable. We have very specific requirements based on our risk models and this platform allows us to meet every single one. > > **Desvantagens**: The classic version is dated, but moving to the Lightening is improving our end user experience. It is also somewhat difficult to learn some of the concepts of relational data, how they integrate and are maximized for those who don't have a background in software back ends. Having said that, I'm not a developer and can do most of my own configurations. > > It took us time to set up and integrate all of our data, but just plan development for all but one of the 40 teams, went from estimated 3-5 days, down to 1 day. That is BIA data collection in the AM and BCP in the PM. We had basic plans with requirements done in 1 day\! This saved us 10K hours of team time during the first year. We have been thrilled with the automation both on the planning side and on the Risk Management side. ----- ### "Fusion Framework System" — 5.0/5 > **Brian** | *6 de fevereiro de 2020* | Saúde, bem-estar e condicionamento físico | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Plan configuration and management, Incident management, Processes, Library Procedure Group options, Dashboard for reports, Application and Component records. We were looking to replace our old LDRPS and this was clearly a better tool. > > **Desvantagens**: The inability to remove/delete user accounts. > > The tool works well for our BC and IT plan management. We have taken the next step to use the tool for our disaster recovery exercise monitoring. We are monitoring our exercises and proof of concepts manually and we will eventually implement the Service now connection that will allow us to track, monitor and delegate tasks once an incident is triggered and the plans are executed. We are looking to use the tool too its full capability. ----- Page: 1 / 3\ Seguinte: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pt/software/150583/fusion?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pt/software/150583/fusion) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data